Just recently installed CircuPool RJ45+, of course purchased from Discount Salt Pools. My concern is the amount of CL being generated so I would like to get other owners experience. Installed this new unit 2 weeks ago.
Intentionally oversized the SWG for my 9000 gallon pool with the RJ45+. Therefore I expected to see significant CL production from the unit and so far not really getting significant CL generation. I spoke with DSP and they said based on the RJ consol readings that the unit is producing CL as designed. I am pretty confident in my water chemestry and perhaps I am just not testing long enough. I'll keep testing, but what are the experiences of other CircuPool RJ series owners regarding CL generation?
I've run a few 4 hour tests where I expected to notice a few CL ppm increases and maybe got a 1 or 2 CL ppm bump. oversized RJ45+ at 50% and also tested at 100%. Tonight I'll let run a full 12 hrs at 70% and hopefully can read some recordable bump in CL ppm. Are any other RJ45+ owners having concerns with amount of CL generation?
OF COURSE, water chemestry can play a role along with other issues for CL consumption, but I believe I do not have any big CL consumption while doing these tests. Solar cover on 24x7. Discount Salt Pool tech says phosphates at 200 are above CircuPool requirements (I get the Phosphate debate). As an aside the salt readings from my RJ45+ took a week plus to start getting more accurate salt reads. After about 8 days the RJ45+ is measuring 3250 now (but the SWG measure does move around), K-1766 says 3800 so close enough and I do not think the salt is the issue. Again looking for RJ+ owners experience, I'll remove the Phosphates and run a few more 12 hr test runs
Intentionally oversized the SWG for my 9000 gallon pool with the RJ45+. Therefore I expected to see significant CL production from the unit and so far not really getting significant CL generation. I spoke with DSP and they said based on the RJ consol readings that the unit is producing CL as designed. I am pretty confident in my water chemestry and perhaps I am just not testing long enough. I'll keep testing, but what are the experiences of other CircuPool RJ series owners regarding CL generation?
I've run a few 4 hour tests where I expected to notice a few CL ppm increases and maybe got a 1 or 2 CL ppm bump. oversized RJ45+ at 50% and also tested at 100%. Tonight I'll let run a full 12 hrs at 70% and hopefully can read some recordable bump in CL ppm. Are any other RJ45+ owners having concerns with amount of CL generation?
OF COURSE, water chemestry can play a role along with other issues for CL consumption, but I believe I do not have any big CL consumption while doing these tests. Solar cover on 24x7. Discount Salt Pool tech says phosphates at 200 are above CircuPool requirements (I get the Phosphate debate). As an aside the salt readings from my RJ45+ took a week plus to start getting more accurate salt reads. After about 8 days the RJ45+ is measuring 3250 now (but the SWG measure does move around), K-1766 says 3800 so close enough and I do not think the salt is the issue. Again looking for RJ+ owners experience, I'll remove the Phosphates and run a few more 12 hr test runs
PH | 7.4 |
FC | 4 |
TA | 90 |
CYA | 80 |
CH | 350 |
CSI | -0.49 |
Water temp | 66 |
Phosphates | 200 |