Spoken like one who's never had an SWG!
Kidding. Your reasoning is sound, especially the part about moving and not being able to recoup the initial investment. That's a fair point. SWGs last for many years, but need to be
owned for all those years to get your ROI.
I could quibble:
- Yes, you buy less chlorine, but significantly less. Like 90-100% less.
- And yes, it seems acid consumption goes up, but a true comparison should state that it
seems like more than it is. "Conditioner" in a puck is acid. When you stop using pucks for an SWG, you stop adding the conditioner/acid, so yes, you have to add some acid, but that's only because you stopped adding acid.
- Humans, chlorine and acid leave salt behind, as a byproduct. So not all pools need to "keep up on the salt content." If anything, they have to figure out how to lower it, just as they would in a non-SWG pool. If you live in a climate with a lot of rain, or otherwise lose a lot of pool water (other than by evaporation), then yes, you might have to keep up. I add about a bag a year, once a year. $7.
- Following TFP guidelines for chemical balance minimizes and in most cases eliminates any reason to clean an SWG. There is no other maintenance, other than adjusting the output % a few times a year. And that's a push of a button or a click of a mouse.
The initial startup cost argument is valid. As is the notion of running your pump longer. One more thing to break: absolutely.
Pros? Yes, less chlorine to buy and add... and drive to pick up, and lug from store to car, then car to house, then house to pool. So that's a trip to the store every week or two. And dosing your pool every day or two. Plus storing it all somewhere. You kind'a washed over those negatives that an SWG eliminates. With the exception of the odd party or two, I don't touch chlorine for at least nine months a year. And because my FC is so stable during all that time, I only have to test for it once a week. That is a HUGE reduction in pool maintenance over liquid chlorine users. And it is that reduction in chores that is at the core of all the support here for an SWG.
You also missed this pro. Because an SWG adds chlorine very often, a very little at a time, not only is your FC stable 24/7, you can lower your FC level some, which is nice for most of us who appreciate having a little less in the pool. And because pouring in liquid chlorine, every day, is such a drag, most folks will pour in more, so that they can go an extra day or two without having to do it, so they end up spiking their FC, and/or re-dosing only after FC drops dangerously low. So for a lot of the time, your FC is either uncomfortably high, or too close to not properly sanitizing your pool. Let's face it, we're lazy, and without an SWG the FC level is rarely going to be at the best level for your pool and your family...
SWG users can leave their pools for a week or two while away. Liquid chlorine users have to resort to using pucks or friends or neighbors. I think it's safe to say all three of those "solutions" are not sustainable.
I'd like to think that's a slightly fairer comparison...