Hello TFPers,
I’ve started collecting quotes to resurface my plaster pool here in Southern California. It’s a 25,000-gallon pool, and so far, the estimates I’ve received are around $19,000 for plaster and $22,000 for either pebble or fiberglass composite.
The scope of work includes
- Resurfacing
- New tile,
- Splitting the drains
- New expansion sealer
- And startup
I plan to keep the existing coping. From what I can tell, the plumbing is copper, and one contractor mentioned that fiberglass composite might be the best option since it would prevent any copper from leaching into the surface.
I’ve heard of pre-made fiberglass pools, but not fiberglass composite surfaces.
I’m mainly wondering if these prices sound reasonable for Southern California, and whether fiberglass composite is a smart choice compared to plaster or pebble. Is maintenance harder than pebble?
thx
I’ve started collecting quotes to resurface my plaster pool here in Southern California. It’s a 25,000-gallon pool, and so far, the estimates I’ve received are around $19,000 for plaster and $22,000 for either pebble or fiberglass composite.
The scope of work includes
- Resurfacing
- New tile,
- Splitting the drains
- New expansion sealer
- And startup
I plan to keep the existing coping. From what I can tell, the plumbing is copper, and one contractor mentioned that fiberglass composite might be the best option since it would prevent any copper from leaching into the surface.
I’ve heard of pre-made fiberglass pools, but not fiberglass composite surfaces.
I’m mainly wondering if these prices sound reasonable for Southern California, and whether fiberglass composite is a smart choice compared to plaster or pebble. Is maintenance harder than pebble?
thx