Chris- Thank you for running those numbers and your explanation.
Marty- Any reason to go above a 1.5 hp motor?
Marty- Any reason to go above a 1.5 hp motor?
Return head (via PSI) is only part of the total head loss in plumbing. It doesn't include suction head, the head loss between the pump and filter and the head loss in the multi-port valve. If you include those items (assumed 35' runs with 1.5" plumbing), it would be more like 63 GPM @ 56'. Also, height of waterfall is only 2.5'.So back to your pump issue. I got the curves for the Super Pump. Look at the black dotted line for SP2610X15. Y axis is your discharge pressure in ft of head. 15 psi is about 34.6 ft of head. So your flow rate at this condition is about 70 gpm. If you use the 2 speed equivalent you can't get enough pressure to flow anywhere near this amount. Maximum discharge pressure would be 17 ft of head. 6 of this would be required just to overcome the elevation could be more if your fountain is over 6' high. The rest of the pressure drop would be to overcome pressure drop in pipe, valves, fittings, and filter. My rough estimate would be 10 gpm. The actual flow depends on the elevation difference and a little more detail on the piping.
If you want what you are currently getting out the waterfall and the pool returns, and be able to run the pump at a lower speed, then yes, you need a larger VS pump.Marty- Any reason to go above a 1.5 hp motor?
Return head (via PSI) is only part of the total head loss in plumbing. It doesn't include suction head, the head loss between the pump and filter and the head loss in the multi-port valve. If you include those items (assumed 35' runs with 1.5" plumbing), it would be more like 63 GPM @ 56'. Also, height of waterfall is only 2.5'.
But given the picture, I would hazard to guess that the some of the water is being bypassed around the waterfall to the pool returns?
If that is the case, then it really complicates the estimates because there is no way to know how much flow is being bypassed and if that bypass will work at half speed.
If you want a true estimate, I would need a lot more details about the pool plumbing and equipment plus pressure measurements with just the returns and just the waterfall.
If you want what you are currently getting out the waterfall and the pool returns, and be able to run the pump at a lower speed, then yes, you need a larger VS pump.
Any chance you can turn off the waterfall for daily operation and just turn it on when you can be there to enjoy it?
Good idea to close during day to day operations and open occasionally as wanted.
If you are going to replace the swg anyway and get a new pump it's a no brainer to get a matched set and add automation. I have the Hayward swg and it was around 1k to get it bundled with a prolific controller. I added a Hayward ecostar for under 1k and have automation and control for everything with 1 button pushes. If your waterfall has it's own line you can program the speeds and the valves to open with just a push of a button whenever you want them on or off. Most swg are in the 600-700 range standalone some even higher for name brands and you work off of timers. Depending how you electric is at the equipment pad you may have easy work of the hookup or need additional work that you may not be able to DIY not sure how comfy you are with it. My thought is just that if you are doing a new pump and cleaning toward a VS and you will replace the swg anyway you are 80% to the cost of a matching system with automation and it's really nice for ease of use. Wife can just push a button when she wants waterfall going.
This is mentioned occasionally, but I think it bears repeating. If you decide to go with the VS pump, give serious consideration to a surge suppression solution. These pumps are very expensive and the electronics are quite susceptible to power surges that can fry them, making them useless. If you wire it yourself, this can be done for $100'ish bucks...a good electrician could get one installed for $200'ish bucks. Cheap insurance as far as I am concerned.
Buck, I had a manual valve for control of my waterfall for 20+ years, and only turned it on a few times (right after the pool was built) because it was such a pain (well, and my original waterfall was not that great looking, haha). You really do want automation of the flow to the falls if you want to enjoy them (even occasionally).
An unrelated suggestion: it looks like your waterfall is splashing-back/dripping-back water to its foundation and onto your deck. From my experience, getting a waterfall to look decent cascading over a natural stone ledge requires a pretty high volume. You can possibly improve all three of those issues ("look", "splashback", "high volume requirement") by adding a "lip" to your waterfall ledge.
Here is what I ended up doing:
COMPLETED: DIY Travertine Pool / Patio / Waterfall Remodel in AZ
Unless we have kids in the pool (who like high flow), this lip allows us to run our waterfalls at a very low volume for the "trickle sound" ambiance and look.
We are in a "new" home and have yet to install a surge suppressor. In our last house, we had one at the meter (through the power company) and also one installed at the main panel. I also had surge power strips for the electronics. Was it over kill? Probably. But, where we lived...there were lots of lightning storms and while we had neighbors a couple of houses down that had stuff get fried, we always lucked out.I do want to install surge protection. Do you recommend whole house protection at the main box, or do I protect at the 240v breakers by the pool equipment?
Can anyone suggest a good surge protector?