- Nov 12, 2017
- 12,691
- Pool Size
- 12300
- Surface
- Plaster
- Chlorine
- Salt Water Generator
- SWG Type
- Pentair Intellichlor IC-40
My SWG started working OK a couple weeks ago, when I first fired it up after its winter hiatus. But then a few days later it stopped working. It was reading low salt (about 2200-2500 depending on the day), though my Taylor test read 3400. That low level reading keeps the SWG from producing chlorine, and also keeps my IntellipH from dosing. Double bummer.
I goosed the RPMs a bit, but that didn't help. I waited a week thinking the water needed to warm up a bit more, that didn't help either.
Today I busted out my previous SWG and swapped its flow switch into the active SWG. And that solved it. So, bad flow switch.
An observation: I had saved my old SWG because it had a little life left. But for about a year before I retired it, it had stopped reading salt level. ScreenLogic reported "0" salt. The SWG would make chlorine, it just wouldn't report salt. This was a known issue back then, without any real solution (that I had heard of), save replacing the entire unit (warranty or no). I believe some people tried a new flow switch to solve this, and I think I remember that it didn't solve the problem, at least not consistently (@Jimrahbe might be able to fill in the gaps of my memory on this).
So eventually I replaced the SWG, but saved the old one. At the time, my strategy was to replace an SWG while it still had some life left, to act as a standby that could easily be swapped in should my current SWG ever fail. That way, I'd have SWG service while awaiting a replacement for the failed one. That plan is to always have an "SWG in Waiting" for this very reason, which I plan to still follow.
But another benefit to this strategy I discovered today. A back up flow switch! Now that my current SWG is working again, I do get a good salt reading (SWG and Taylor are only different by 200). So that kinda confirms that zero-salt problem was never the flow switch.
So whether you want to make use of the "SWG in Waiting" scheme or not, never throw out an old one. Or at the very least, save its flow switch. Which I see are about $140-$220+ now, depending on the seller! (Which is what I just saved today!!)
I goosed the RPMs a bit, but that didn't help. I waited a week thinking the water needed to warm up a bit more, that didn't help either.
Today I busted out my previous SWG and swapped its flow switch into the active SWG. And that solved it. So, bad flow switch.
An observation: I had saved my old SWG because it had a little life left. But for about a year before I retired it, it had stopped reading salt level. ScreenLogic reported "0" salt. The SWG would make chlorine, it just wouldn't report salt. This was a known issue back then, without any real solution (that I had heard of), save replacing the entire unit (warranty or no). I believe some people tried a new flow switch to solve this, and I think I remember that it didn't solve the problem, at least not consistently (@Jimrahbe might be able to fill in the gaps of my memory on this).
So eventually I replaced the SWG, but saved the old one. At the time, my strategy was to replace an SWG while it still had some life left, to act as a standby that could easily be swapped in should my current SWG ever fail. That way, I'd have SWG service while awaiting a replacement for the failed one. That plan is to always have an "SWG in Waiting" for this very reason, which I plan to still follow.
But another benefit to this strategy I discovered today. A back up flow switch! Now that my current SWG is working again, I do get a good salt reading (SWG and Taylor are only different by 200). So that kinda confirms that zero-salt problem was never the flow switch.
So whether you want to make use of the "SWG in Waiting" scheme or not, never throw out an old one. Or at the very least, save its flow switch. Which I see are about $140-$220+ now, depending on the seller! (Which is what I just saved today!!)