I agree it's a want and not a need and stated that previously (with italics to emphasize it).
The point that is being missed in this discussion is that these systems WORK. Just like a hair net, they pre-filter your water and keep stuff out of your primary filter.
You can't throw cost into a discussion about whether or not something works. You CAN ask yourself if a MultiCyclone is worth the money. That's a legitimate question but has nothing to do with whether or not it works.
Some people here prefer to clean their filters more often rather than spend the money to clean their filters less often. That's perfectly fine. But, I've heard people here say they would bypass their IFCS even if it worked and would throw the MultiCyclone in the trash. Those types of comments can confuse new pool owners and are a disservice to the community. Let's keep cost out of the discussion about how effective pool equipment is and let people decide for themselves whether or not the cost is worthwhile - to them.
The point that is being missed in this discussion is that these systems WORK. Just like a hair net, they pre-filter your water and keep stuff out of your primary filter.
You can't throw cost into a discussion about whether or not something works. You CAN ask yourself if a MultiCyclone is worth the money. That's a legitimate question but has nothing to do with whether or not it works.
Some people here prefer to clean their filters more often rather than spend the money to clean their filters less often. That's perfectly fine. But, I've heard people here say they would bypass their IFCS even if it worked and would throw the MultiCyclone in the trash. Those types of comments can confuse new pool owners and are a disservice to the community. Let's keep cost out of the discussion about how effective pool equipment is and let people decide for themselves whether or not the cost is worthwhile - to them.