- Apr 29, 2015
- 51
- Pool Size
- 4400
- Surface
- Fiberglass
- Chlorine
- Salt Water Generator
- SWG Type
- Hayward Turbo Cell (T-CELL-5)
@Texas Splash - I forgot to answer one of your questions - no, I did not close the pool over the winter.
Absolutely! At least half or slightly more would be a good start. Not too low beyond that though so your liner doesn't shift. Then re-test CYA and assess overall water condition from that point forward. Good thing you checked that CYA!I'm thinking a partial water exchange is my best option at this point, as that would address both the CYA and the copper (if there is any). Do you guys agree?
You can’t guess over 100. The scale doesn’t work that way as much as it seems to. You need to do a dilution test with half tap water and half pool/CYA mix. If the result is under 100, multiple X 2. If it’s still 100+, Use 2 parts tap and multiply X3. And so on.I did a CYA test and it was off the charts. My test kit only has lines up to a CYA of 100, but I would guess it's in the 120-130 range
To remove anything, CYA / metals / Calcium etc, it’s an even percentage if done in one shot. 50% drain lowers the level by half, and so on. If you do partial drains each subsequent drain loses some value because you are also draining some fresh water on the second drain. The more partial drains you do the less efficient it is. A 10% drain with 100 CYa will get you to 90. Another 10% drain will remove 9 and leave you 81. It’s not a bad loss if you are only draining to remove, say 20 % but if you were partial draining to remove 80% it would add up. The higher the initial CYA (etc) is, The more loss is seen with each subsequent drain.I'm thinking a partial water exchange is my best option at this point, as that would address both the CYA and the copper (if there is any). Do you guys agree? And if so, how much
Not an expert either, but GREAT catch James !!An expert will be along as soon to tell you I’m talking gibberish or to confirm if this could be part of your problem
Yes, that's definitely the case here. Just did all the measurements on the inside of the box, not realizing it was either/or. Did a bit more reading up, and won't make that mistake again.But. Way more often than not, a newbie lists it as part of their testing because it’s on the shaker block. Hopefully that’s the case here.
Trust me. If you’re gonna screw *anything* up...... adding a bogus test value is the way to GO !!!!Did a bit more reading up, and won't make that mistake again.