I just took delivery of my spa this July, and we love it. I'm converting to a salt water tub with a SmarterSpa SWG. When I was first looking into the SmarterSpa, the inline kit seemed very appealing, as my tub has a circulation pump that runs all the time, so should work for the inline install just fine. However, since the spa is so new, it's still in warranty and
I didn't want to mess with anything in the cabinet until that runs out. Hence, I have a drop in cell for the time being. Once the cell needs replacement, the warranty should have expired, so I can convert to inline at that time.
Meanwhile, dropping the cell over the side is fine, but given the size of my tub, the cell run time may end up needing to be quite a long time, so I'd like to figure out a way to be able to leave it in the water while we use it. It fits in the filter area, but that seems not ideal since the water's not that deep. However, I did notice that one of my filters has the cap and hole in the middle for installing a Nature2 mineral stick, which I do not have. That hole fits the OD of the salt cell perfectly, so I can stuff the cell into the middle of the filter and it seals into the bottom of the filter opening leading to the circ pump. Then the hole in the end of the cell becomes the only path for water to flow. The upper end of the cell seals to the top of the filter body, preserving the filtering action. It's like it was designed to go here. Do you think the flow rate through the cell in this location will be adequate to draw the chlorine down into the system against buoyancy without being faster than what the cell can handle? Or am I just creating a chlorine trap that's going to degrade my cell body and filter faster than necessary, as well as not sense the correct chlorine levels in the spa water?
The inline kit installs the cell pointed up, so the bubbles rise in the same direction as the water flow and the chlorine sensor is at the bottom where it won't see any effect from its own chlorine production until it has mixed through the whole tub. That is obviously the better orientation, but putting it in the filter would be nice if it works okay in the meantime. I might test it a bit to see how it compares once I have the levels set for the typical operation.
I didn't want to mess with anything in the cabinet until that runs out. Hence, I have a drop in cell for the time being. Once the cell needs replacement, the warranty should have expired, so I can convert to inline at that time.
Meanwhile, dropping the cell over the side is fine, but given the size of my tub, the cell run time may end up needing to be quite a long time, so I'd like to figure out a way to be able to leave it in the water while we use it. It fits in the filter area, but that seems not ideal since the water's not that deep. However, I did notice that one of my filters has the cap and hole in the middle for installing a Nature2 mineral stick, which I do not have. That hole fits the OD of the salt cell perfectly, so I can stuff the cell into the middle of the filter and it seals into the bottom of the filter opening leading to the circ pump. Then the hole in the end of the cell becomes the only path for water to flow. The upper end of the cell seals to the top of the filter body, preserving the filtering action. It's like it was designed to go here. Do you think the flow rate through the cell in this location will be adequate to draw the chlorine down into the system against buoyancy without being faster than what the cell can handle? Or am I just creating a chlorine trap that's going to degrade my cell body and filter faster than necessary, as well as not sense the correct chlorine levels in the spa water?
The inline kit installs the cell pointed up, so the bubbles rise in the same direction as the water flow and the chlorine sensor is at the bottom where it won't see any effect from its own chlorine production until it has mixed through the whole tub. That is obviously the better orientation, but putting it in the filter would be nice if it works okay in the meantime. I might test it a bit to see how it compares once I have the levels set for the typical operation.