Last year I obtained three quotes for pool renovation, specifically to fix failing plaster, replace and/or reset coping, and replace tile around waterline. I ultimately did not proceed, and put it off until this year. I am back at it, and am going to expand the project to include renovating portions of the deck, new skimmers, etc. Working on an RFP right now – this site has been helpful.
One source of confusion is that in none of the three quotes from last year did anyone suggest the possibility of chipping out the old plaster. They all referenced chipping it out only around fixtures, or where there were visible cracks. Otherwise they all said the majority of the pool surface would be “etched” and a bonding agent would be used to affix the new plaster/finish.
I asked if it would be an option to have the old plaster chipped out, and they were not very responsive – it was like if that was what I wanted, I would have to bring someone else in to do it. Is this normal behavior for PBs? I realize it is more work, but expected it to be mentioned as an (at additional cost) item.
Am I wrong in thinking that chipping out the old plaster is the more “right” way to do this, if I am concerned about longevity of the new surface? Is the lack of enthusiasm around this option typical?
Thanks
One source of confusion is that in none of the three quotes from last year did anyone suggest the possibility of chipping out the old plaster. They all referenced chipping it out only around fixtures, or where there were visible cracks. Otherwise they all said the majority of the pool surface would be “etched” and a bonding agent would be used to affix the new plaster/finish.
I asked if it would be an option to have the old plaster chipped out, and they were not very responsive – it was like if that was what I wanted, I would have to bring someone else in to do it. Is this normal behavior for PBs? I realize it is more work, but expected it to be mentioned as an (at additional cost) item.
Am I wrong in thinking that chipping out the old plaster is the more “right” way to do this, if I am concerned about longevity of the new surface? Is the lack of enthusiasm around this option typical?
Thanks