OK, we're getting there (though I still want to see more than theoretical math). There are many other considerations, some of which have been brought up by others. Some of whom have pretty much debunked the warranty (most pool warranties are of very little value). What are the other ongoing maintenance expenses? How long does this pool last compared to gunite? Is the OP going to live in that house for decades, or is this his starter home? I'm working in another thread with a pool that is 48 years old! Others I've seen here are approaching 75! You have to add the cost of replastering every decade or two for gunite. Pebble finishes are helping to improve that number. So concrete pools can muster up some pretty reliable long-term costs. The OP needs to do that math along with the heating savings, to come up with the projected value for Radiant. Will he have to replace the entire pool every ten years? Or will long-term maintenance compare to a gunite pool? I did similar math when trying to decide about pebble vs plaster. Pebble was about 50% more. This is my forever home, I guessed at my remaining lifespan to figure out how many more times I'd have to replace plaster vs pebble. I'm hoping the pebble I decided on will outlast me, which would make it a better value (for me) than two more plaster replacements. Point being, that's the kind of math I'm suggesting the OP do, and for that he needs some real world data about Radiant Pools (to compare with the real world math available for other types of pools). The savings on heating would be meaningless if the pool only lasts a few years, but substantial if the pool might last 100...