Old pool advice

poolwilly

Member
Jul 12, 2023
9
Pittsfield, MA
Hi! First, I just want to say that this forum/website is amazing-- I've learned so much from it, and am constantly impressed by the care and civility in all the discussions.

I was wondering if people could offer some advice on whether it is worth keeping old pool. We recently bought a house in Berkshire County, MA. It has a 30 year old pool, 39,000 gallon in-ground pool that was traditionally used during about 3 months of the year. We've had it looked at, and it would require about $5000 in plaster and stone repair to be functional. (The previous owners were somewhat negligent, didn't balance calcium, etc.) It would also need a heater, new pump, some above-ground pipe repair, and a new cover, all of which adds cost, which we might be willing to do. But my big concern is that it is not worth putting this kind of money into such an old pool, as I've been told that a broken pipe below ground or leak would be far more expensive (it is also really, really hard to find pool experts around here). So my question is whether people think it is worth it to get a 30 year old pool up and running. Or am I just going to spend $20K only to find myself facing much bigger problems in a few years.

I realize this may be more of a philosophical than practical question, but appreciate any responses. Thank you!
 
Hi! First, I just want to say that this forum/website is amazing-- I've learned so much from it, and am constantly impressed by the care and civility in all the discussions.

I was wondering if people could offer some advice on whether it is worth keeping old pool. We recently bought a house in Berkshire County, MA. It has a 30 year old pool, 39,000 gallon in-ground pool that was traditionally used during about 3 months of the year. We've had it looked at, and it would require about $5000 in plaster and stone repair to be functional. (The previous owners were somewhat negligent, didn't balance calcium, etc.) It would also need a heater, new pump, some above-ground pipe repair, and a new cover, all of which adds cost, which we might be willing to do. But my big concern is that it is not worth putting this kind of money into such an old pool, as I've been told that a broken pipe below ground or leak would be far more expensive (it is also really, really hard to find pool experts around here). So my question is whether people think it is worth it to get a 30 year old pool up and running. Or am I just going to spend $20K only to find myself facing much bigger problems in a few years.

I realize this may be more of a philosophical than practical question, but appreciate any responses. Thank you!
Totally depends on what’s broken and what’s there. There’s nothing inherent in a pool where age makes it unfeasible to be repaired.

All plaster pools need plaster to be replaced periodically. Pipes can be dig up, equipment replaced etc. if the pool shell itself was somehow damaged enough to require total replacement then that might not actually be worth it, but that’s not really an age issue.
 
Any idea what it would cost to get rid of it? I'm guessing that's not cheap either, and may factor in to your decision.

You said the previous owner had been negligent, but do you know when the last time was that it was running?
 
Willy,

What is keeping you from running it like it is for a few weeks and see if it holds water or not???

Show us some pics of the equipment pad and the basic pool, so we can help get you pointed in the right direction.

Thanks,

Jim R.
 
Thread Status
Hello , This thread has been inactive for over 60 days. New postings here are unlikely to be seen or responded to by other members. For better visibility, consider Starting A New Thread.