Thank you. I didn't realize there was a correlation between the two. I have another temp sensor in the pool measuring at 85 while the cell is at 93 (these are both coming from my omnilogic app. Does that sound right or do I need to investigate further?The temperature increase is the reason that the amperage is higher.
Ok, let me see if I can figure this out. The SWG is definitely wrong. The pool is not that warm and I have used the heater to warm up the pool in the past 24 hours, but the heater definitely does not use the SWG temp for that.They should be the same.
Which one is correct?
Definitely investigate.
As long as the amps are below 8.0, you should be good.Question...as practice, should I turn the SWG off when running the heater?
That is an 8 degree temperature rise.I have another temp sensor in the pool measuring at 85 while the cell is at 93
It's the Hayward H300FDN.That is an 8 degree temperature rise.
What heater do you have?
Thank you so much for this information. I'm now thinking about whether there is a balance between going to min flow to increase water temp and just turn the chlorinator off while the heater is on to be most efficient and then use liquid chlorine to bring the FC up if I need to while the SWG is off.For a 300,000 btu/hr heater with 83% efficiency, the actual heat transferred to the water will be about 250,000 btu/hr.
250,000/(GPM x 60 x 8.34)
The formula for temperature rise from inlet to outlet is Y = 500/X.
X = 500/Y.
So, if you know the temperature rise, you can estimate the flow.
For a temperature rise of 8 degrees, the flow can be estimated at 500/8 = 62.5 GPM.
If you drop the flow down to 50 GPM, the temp rise should be about 10 degrees.
If you drop the flow down to 40 GPM, the temp rise should be about 12.5 degrees.
If you drop the flow down to 35 GPM, the temp rise should be about 14 degrees.
If we use the minimum allowable flow rate of 25 gpm, then the maximum temperature rise that you should ever see is 20 degrees.
I would probably target 35 to 40 GPM to save power while providing enough flow.
The only problem with going lower on the flow is that the higher temp rise might make the cell amps go above 8.0 and that would cause an error.
If you lower the salinity, that would allow a slower pump speed without causing a high amp/high salt error.
View attachment 526756
View attachment 526753
View attachment 526759
plot Y = 500/X, y from 3 to 50 - Wolfram|Alpha
Wolfram|Alpha brings expert-level knowledge and capabilities to the broadest possible range of people—spanning all professions and education levels.www.wolframalpha.com
Just turned the heater off and the cell temp went down immediately 85.9. Amps are at 6.66.So, right now, with the heater on, the cell temp is 94.8, and I believe it's the inlet temp at 85.
The formula for temperature rise from inlet to outlet is Y = 500/X.So, right now, with the heater on, the cell temp is 94.8, and I believe it's the inlet temp at 85.
So if I understand everything you've been sharing with me, then I could theoretically reduce the flow by 50% and still hit the min requirements of the heater...does that sound right?The formula for temperature rise from inlet to outlet is Y = 500/X.
X = 500/Y.
For a 10 degree temperature rise, we can estimate the flow to be about 50 gpm.
A few questions:I would probably target 35 to 40 GPM to save power while providing enough flow.
In my opinion, 25 gpm is too low.
What is the power usage at 60%.
You can change the reading from percentage to rpm in the settings if you want.