So, my turbocell just went out. I'm pretty sure this one lasted a good 10 years or so (I've had it for 6). Word on the street is that this is a pretty long time for these things and I was probably lucky?
I was at the pool store to get liquid chlorine, and I asked the GM if they sold TurboCells. The answer was no. He proceeds to go on a minor rant about how he can't sell customers something he knows will fail in 3-4 years, that he thinks people were sold a bill of goods because the PH creep makes it hard to keep the pool balanced so you aren't really saving time or money vs. using a floater with chlorine tabs, and at one point even mentioned that people think they are getting a salt generator that "doesn't use chlorine" (customer confusion). I'm not even sure what the point was with the last statement, I mean, some customers get confused about things yes. People in general do.
Anyhoo, does anyone have an opinion on if it is worth spending another $500+ dollars to replace the cell vs. using another method of chlorination? Assuming I'm lucky and a new cell lasts 5 years, $100 a year, I mean it will probably save some $ vs. liquid chlorine, but I have a bucket full of chlorine tabs right now (I don't even remember where it came from, I must have bought it a few years back before I really knew what I was doing. What would be the drawbacks of switching to tabs now? Assuming my PH would stay more stable vs. using an SWG, true? I'm guessing my Calcium might go up? Would CYA also go up permanently over time?
Just wondering, since I'm at this point of decision, if there is a better choice than just automatically replacing the SWG.
Thanks all.
I was at the pool store to get liquid chlorine, and I asked the GM if they sold TurboCells. The answer was no. He proceeds to go on a minor rant about how he can't sell customers something he knows will fail in 3-4 years, that he thinks people were sold a bill of goods because the PH creep makes it hard to keep the pool balanced so you aren't really saving time or money vs. using a floater with chlorine tabs, and at one point even mentioned that people think they are getting a salt generator that "doesn't use chlorine" (customer confusion). I'm not even sure what the point was with the last statement, I mean, some customers get confused about things yes. People in general do.
Anyhoo, does anyone have an opinion on if it is worth spending another $500+ dollars to replace the cell vs. using another method of chlorination? Assuming I'm lucky and a new cell lasts 5 years, $100 a year, I mean it will probably save some $ vs. liquid chlorine, but I have a bucket full of chlorine tabs right now (I don't even remember where it came from, I must have bought it a few years back before I really knew what I was doing. What would be the drawbacks of switching to tabs now? Assuming my PH would stay more stable vs. using an SWG, true? I'm guessing my Calcium might go up? Would CYA also go up permanently over time?
Just wondering, since I'm at this point of decision, if there is a better choice than just automatically replacing the SWG.
Thanks all.