It was about csi in plaster where one wants to maintain a lower ta to reduce ph rise. This could apply to salt and plaster or liquid chlorine and plaster
I don't think that he has ever recommended calcium for a SWG pool. I think that you mean CSI for plaster. In that case, I would suggest a higher pH, such as 7.7 to 7.8 to help keep the CSI in a non-corrosive range.
For pH testing you are doing a color comparison so strong, indirect lighting works best and putting a uniform background color behind the comparator block helps as well. I actually find that standing in the shade and holding the block up to a bright blue sky works really well for me. The trick I found is to use a background color that makes all of the test colors in the comparator look unique/different and then compare the solution (it's not the actual color that matters, just the differences in shade). Some background colors make all the colors in the block blend together and look like the same shade. Blue sky works the best in most cases for me.
It certainly sounds like you'd do better with a cartridge filter but you'd need a fairly large (aka, expensive) one so you're not having to take it apart all the time. Something to save up for, I suppose.
If the husband thinks you're crazy then just offer him the opportunity to take over the pool care
Feel free to contact me anytime, I'm always happy to help if I can.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thank you! and LOL at the husband taking over. He does compliment me on the beauty of the pool water, but thinks I'm being way too picky. I'm also fascinated with reading the forum and learning more; I try to tell him things and he just doesn't get my excitement - teehee! It's a harmless habit and I'm thankful for the other pool enthusiasts here that will listen![]()
With you being a teacher and having dedicated your life to learning and teaching others (bless you if you teach middle school! I just could never teach that age group), I am not at all surprised by your TFP addiction
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And then there's a pool party and BBQ @ your house right?I have a mesquite tree that is the bane of my existence (there's a chainsaw in that tree's future).
JoyfulNoise said:but could your filter be undersized for your pool needs.
And then there's a pool party and BBQ @ your house right?I loves me some mesquite BBQ!
.
And then there's a pool party and BBQ @ your house right?I loves me some mesquite BBQ!
.
I would bet that it's the DE in the sand filter that is the culprit behind the twice-a-week need to backwash. If you add too much, you are effectively creating an undersized filter.
Are you making sure that you are only adding just enough DE to raise filter pressure by 1/2 - 1lb at the most?
After you add DE, filter pressure will continue to rise for several minutes, and can suddenly spike up to an hour after you add it.... So start slow- 1/4 cup or so- and watch for the rise... Then add a little more if there's been no change in 15-20 mins. Continue like that until you get that very small rise. Always start off with a freshly backwashed filter, and if you overshoot and the pressure goes up by more than a pound, do a quick backwash, and start over again.
Make a note of how much it took once you've got it right, and next time start with about 75% of that amount.
Remember the reason for adding the DE in the first place is that sand filters do their job better when they are a little dirty. What you are trying to simulate is a sand bed that's not squeaky-clean. If you're only wanting to "polish" your water by using the DE, then you should probably stick to tiniest amount possible-- it really doesn't take much. In which case, it probably won't increase backwashing frequency much, if at all.
- - - Updated - - -
BTW, couldn't you add the calcium by chlorinating with CalHypo, and then DH wouldn't have any reason to question it?![]()
Why are there rocks on your coping? Just curious...
Put a fence up and keep the dog out of the pool?
(Sorry, I am not a "dog-person" so I take a dim view of aquatic canines. Plus I think I read chemgeek post once that a single dog is the equivalent of 5 person-hours worth of bather waste....yuck!)
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk