Iron stain from pool salt - all or most salts have iron.

nuttyp

Bronze Supporter
LifeTime Supporter
Nov 23, 2014
213
Naples/Florida
Pool Size
16000
Surface
Plaster
Chlorine
Salt Water Generator
SWG Type
Hayward Aqua Rite (T-15)
I’ve loved my SWG over the past few years. Even with having to add salt and clean the cell every few months, it’s so much easier than dealing with buying, transporting, storing and deploying liquid chlorine constantly. But a recent salt-stain event had me questioning the SWG if there is iron staining from the salt. So I tested several brands and types of salt.

If you want to skip the detail, I concluded: Buy the salt with least amount of iron and, when distributing it, dissolve/distribute it well, not leaving a layer on the pool surface for more than a few minutes. Diamond Crystal and Clorox had the most iron, “Morton” and “Salinity” brands had less iron. “Aquasalt” had the least iron (zero), but tough to find at a reasonable price.

Along the way I got “pool-stored” a bit, that and other details follow….

My “stain event” occurred when I dumped a full 40 lb bag of Clorox pool salt on the top step (as I usually do), but about an inch deep of salt sat there covering the large oval step for a couple hours (after I was interrupted by a post-hurricane power outage). When I came back and brushed it into dissolution there was a noticeable brown stain left on the step – picture enclosed. This prompted me to test several different salt brands for iron content.

Results of the iron tests follow, but I might first note that I usually maintain my chemistry well and keep CSI very close to zero, but this day/week the PH may have floated up towards 8.0 or 8.2 as I was dealing with other post hurricane matters. I think I read that high PH may increase sensitivity to iron staining. Full chemistry at the time: FC 5, PH 8.2, TA 50, CA 200, CYA 25, Salt 2700, Phos 150, WaterTemp 87, CSI 0.1

My test method was arguably extreme, but it was just for comparative purposes. I dissolved 1 lb of each salt brand into 32 oz of water, then tested with a “Hanna Iron (Fe²⁺ & Fe³⁺) Chemical Test Kit model HI3834. Instructions state that it detects the combination of ferrous and ferric ions by first reducing the ferric ions to ferrous. Given the extreme ratio of salt to water, not all salt dissolved, in each case a layer of salt remained on the bottom of the container. And yes, my test reagents expired 7 years ago, but the results are similar to what I was seeing when testing years ago on well water that stained concrete over the course of a year or more from well water irrigation.

Except where noted most of these brands can be had for about $7-$9 per 40lb bag at various big box discount stores. As noted Salinity and AquaSalt were pricier. Detailed results follow, in order of most iron to least iron, noting this may vary from batch to batch. When you research how it’s mined and packaged, there is a lot of variation, depending on many factors such as the original source and all the equipment that comes in contact with the salt along the way.

Edit 1/4/2024: See also post #71 far below, where @AUSpool kindly re-summarized these results to include some additional insights we had gathered about purity and ingredients - from the web and from statements on the salt bags.

Diamond Crystal Water Softener pellets: ~1.0 PPM (mg/L). Slow dissolve, about 45 minutes if they’re not stacked. The pellets look like peanuts.

Diamond Crystal Splash Ready Pool Salt: ~0.5 to 0.75 PPM. Dissolves a lot like morton into smaller clear glassy crystals, then rather slow to finish dissolving over perhaps an hour.

Clorox: ~0.5 PPM (mg/L) iron, maybe higher. Fast & easy to dissolve but clumps if stored for awhile. This is what stained my step surface when an inch of it was left on the surface for a couple hours. Noting again that my PH was running high at 8.0 or 8.2 at the time of stain.

Morton Professional’s Choice Pool Salt: 0.2 ppm / just a trace of iron. A bit slow to dissolve as it first half-dissolves into clear smaller crystals, much like the diamond crystal splash ready.

Salinity brand...... Just a trace of iron, $15/ bag from pool store. Label states “high purity salt for swgs - premium salt blend fine granular quick dissolving with *stain inhibitor” (says imported, ‘Amanaplast’ logo) - Note this finer powder, like Clorox, dissolves quickly when swished or brushed but when spread 1/4" deep takes longer than some others. This would be runner up to the winner, except for the fact that we have no idea what the ”stain inhibitor” chemical is, no ingredients listed. A bit of sequestrant perhaps? Most TFP folks don’t like adding unknown chemicals.

Aquasalt: ZERO trace of iron. This would be the clear winner – except for the price. Very fine and almost powdery, dissolves easily, much like Clorox. But it’s $25/bag from Leslies, delivered. Leslies asks only $12.50 per bag but charges another $12.50/bag for delivery and they won’t ship to the store. I called corporate and a store, no joy. A friend of mine has access to a local wholesale distributor and they told him the price would be $7.50/bag but they never have it and seem uncooperative to order it. Weird that.

More thoughts/speculation:…. Reading the instructions on many salt bags, they advise of course to distribute the salt around the pool, don’t do what I did and leave it stacked in one place for hours. But that seemed bogus to me, since I wondered if I’m simply staining the entire surfaces – just more slowly, gradually. So I continued to wonder about the long term effect of having added more than 1000 lbs of salt over a few years. Still, the pool water itself registers zero trace of iron using the Hanna test kit and all the surfaces look pristine, except for my “stain event” – that I cleared with a sockfull of ascorbic acid powder.

Then I speculated that, like CYA and salt, the summer rains and resultant overflow are probably clearing the iron just like that same overflow & splashout removes CYA and salt itself. Unless the iron is stuck stained to surfaces, gradually staining all surfaces, ugh.

So – not to worry? After all that hoopla and work, I suppose I’ll just buy Morton pool salt and dissolve & distribute it well – LOL.

“Poolstored” sidebar…. While buying the “Salinity” brand from the local PinchAPlenty store I asked the tech if they ever carry Aquasalt. He said no, and he added that he would never buy salt from the big box discount stores. Naturally I asked if he used the stuff I was buying from his store. He said no. So I asked where he buys his, and he said “I can’t tell you – since I work here”. Sigh. If anyone finds a good way to acquire Aquasalt I’m all ears!

As implied by the picture, for stain removal I first started with some vitamin C tablets, then acquired a 2 lb container of ascorbic acid for $17 from wallymart, then used the sock – very simple and easy. Then I got to wondering what happens to the iron that I “wipe off” with ascorbic acid – does it settle elsewhere eventually? Some good threads exist here in TFP on iron removal – many thanks to @Texas Splash, @JoyfulNoise, @Brian Malone, @BoDarville and many others for all those comments in threads such as getting rid of iron and rust and Polyfill and iron binding during AA treatment and related threads. Just for grins I fashioned some polyfill around my cartridge filter and also tried the “aquabag” for a few days on a return port – but never captured any visible iron using those methods. Then again those attempts may be moot since I did not run the PH and FC back up to get any iron to precipitate. And reading through those iron removal threads I never figured out if sequestrant should be present when trying to precipitate the iron. Alas – the surfaces look great and the water is totally clear, so I may have just been wasting even more time!

Thoughts and opinions always welcome and appreciated. Happy SWG-ing and salting everyone. … Joe
 

Attachments

  • stain-early.jpg
    stain-early.jpg
    297.3 KB · Views: 46
  • testresults.jpg
    testresults.jpg
    53.1 KB · Views: 40
  • Bags.jpg
    Bags.jpg
    140.4 KB · Views: 41
  • stain-wideview2.jpg
    stain-wideview2.jpg
    690.7 KB · Views: 43
Last edited:
 
I’ve loved my SWG over the past few years. Even with having to add salt and clean the cell every few months, it’s so much easier than dealing with buying, transporting, storing and deploying liquid chlorine constantly. But a recent salt-stain event had me questioning the SWG if there is iron staining from the salt. So I tested several brands and types of salt.
If you have to clean your salt cell multiple times per year, there’s something very wrong. I’ve been going almost 5 years and it’s still as clean as the first install. You remove precious metal from the plates every time you clean it. You also shouldn’t be having to add salt very often either. I guess if you get tons of rain that could do it though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mdragger88 and pjt
If you have to clean your salt cell multiple times per year, there’s something very wrong. I’ve been going almost 5 years and it’s still as clean as the first install. You remove precious metal from the plates every time you clean it. You also shouldn’t be having to add salt very often either. I guess if you get tons of rain that could do it though.
My cell gets build up within a month of cleaning. I typically wait to clean at least 3 months. No clue what's in the water causing it. My CSI is typically 0 to -.25. No staining other than some minor metal tinting on some of the white PVC jets.
 
My cell gets build up within a month of cleaning. I typically wait to clean at least 3 months. No clue what's in the water causing it. My CSI is typically 0 to -.25. No staining other than some minor metal tinting on some of the white PVC jets.
How are you testing? You have something very very wrong if that’s true.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pjt
Same way I have for 12 years, Taylor TF-100. My CH is high (550 +/-25).
My CH is also pretty close to that high and Mine wasn’t scaling up. Your signature says he use the K100 weekly and the TF 100 once a month? Kind of sounds like your pH is may be running a little too high.
 
My CH is also pretty close to that high and Mine wasn’t scaling up. Your signature says he use the K100 weekly and the TF 100 once a month? Kind of sounds like your pH is may be running a little too high.
I keep my pH 7.5-7.8. Fine tuned with Stenner auto feed.
 
I keep my pH 7.5-7.8. Fine tuned with Stenner auto feed.
I confused your post with original poster. But same reply, if your cell is scaling up that fast, you’re doing something wrong. Very likely testing error. The OP has phosphate results which would seem to come from a pool store.
 

Enjoying this content?

Support TFP with a donation.

Give Support
Thanks for all the thoughts guys. Aside from my OP about iron in pool salt, it seems an interesting debate has emerged about calcium buildup in SWG cells - how fun! @Bperry and @mknauss - you guys report very interesting results that your cells almost never get calcium deposits, and @mknauss has driven that point home elsewhere as well. Yet there are tons of us in TFP reporting the calcium buildup. Given @tcat reporting very careful chemistry management (me too) including high CA and well managed PH of 7.5-7.8, I'm wondering if those folks with little or no buildup manage their PH to the lower end (ABC's of chemistry says 7.2 to 7.8) ABC's of Pool Water Chemistry or if there is some other factor at work. I too manage the chemistry pretty carefully, although I admit it's tough to keep the PH down below 8.0, especially difficult to keep PH below 7.8 when I try to keep the TA higher - towards 70-90, as recommended.

I should have written that I just check my cell every 3 months, and only clean it when needed, because I realize the cell material is depleted by cleaning, even with appropriate mixture of muriatic acid for a few minutes. All this as per the owner's manual and other TFP threads. The need to clean is apparent for two reasons: 1) when there is significant visible buildup of calcium (that popsicle sticks cannot ever remove), and 2) when the aquarite interface registers significantly wrong salt levels vs my Taylor K-1766 test kit, -- and/or when the SWG has trouble generating chlorine. All that said, I'm pleased that I'm in year 4 of my original T-15 cell and I only adjust to higher percentage generation in the summer when chlorine demand is far higher, then adjusted downward in the winter.

The need for much salt varies by region. Daily summer deluge of afternoon rains in SW FL overflow significantly, so I add salt (and CYA) as needed. Almost zero need to add salt or CYA here from October-ish through June-ish.

Phosphates is a non starter I believe. My low level of 150 phosphates is the result of a "Natural Chemistry" test kit I started using when I lived on a golf course and there was a lot of fertilizer overspray. I presume my levels are from landscaper overspray, but all that moot according to ABC's of Pool Water Chemistry and other posts.

In the end, it would indeed be great to find a way to avoid the buildup of calcium in the SWG cell! Thanks again.
 
although I admit it's tough to keep the PH down below 8.0, especially difficult to keep PH below 7.8 when I try to keep the TA higher - towards 70-90, as recommended.
Why would you keep the TA that high? That’s why your pH is so high and it’s probably gets higher if you’re only testing it once a week or once a month. My pH floats around 7.6 or 7.8 this past summer. But in the past it hovered 7.8 most of the time.

I’d suggest your test results should be inspected for errors. I haven’t heard all that many people who are following TFP get SWCG buildup. Maybe it’s more common than I’ve seen. It’s often newer folks that were following a pool store testing regimen.
 
Why would you keep the TA that high? That’s why your pH is so high and it’s probably gets higher if you’re only testing it once a week or once a month. My pH floats around 7.6 or 7.8 this past summer. But in the past it hovered 7.8 most of the time.

I’d suggest your test results should be inspected for errors. I haven’t heard all that many people who are following TFP get SWCG buildup. Maybe it’s more common than I’ve seen. It’s often newer folks that were following a pool store testing regimen.
TA 60-80 is recommended in pool math. I try to keep mine around 70.
 
Why would you keep the TA that high?
Well, maybe I'm learning something :) Please know that I've not trusted or used poolstores for tests (or just about anything else) in 20 years - I use the standard kits noted in my signature. But it's still a fair point that I should get calibration/verification of my tests, thanks. About the high goal TA, below is an excerpt from the ABC's on TFP that implies 50-90 ppm or higher, and I believe I've read that in here in "the deep end" many many times. But I still may have misunderstood and I would love to leave the TA lower. I think if you search for "SWG Cleaning" eg Google search results you'll see over 10 pages of TFP posts relating to those "tons of folks" needing to clean them. Are we all misunderstanding the proper TA goal level? It's possible!

1734729073424.png
 
TA 60-80 is recommended in pool math. I try to keep mine around 70
So here we go.... Me too, but as soon as I try to get it near that 70, 80 or even 90, that's when my PH keeps trying to rise correspondingly faster, and I have to add muriatic acid to keep PH down, then my TA falls again. I've been in that cycle for years.
 
Well, maybe I'm learning something :) Please know that I've not trusted or used poolstores for tests (or just about anything else) in 20 years - I use the standard kits noted in my signature. But it's still a fair point that I should get calibration/verification of my tests, thanks. About the high goal TA, below is an excerpt from the ABC's on TFP that implies 50-90 ppm or higher, and I believe I've read that in here in "the deep end" many many times. But I still may have misunderstood and I would love to leave the TA lower. I think if you search for "SWG Cleaning" eg Google search results you'll see over 10 pages of TFP posts relating to those "tons of folks" needing to clean them. Are we all misunderstanding the proper TA goal level? It's possible!

View attachment 621951
Agreed. I've used my Leslie's maybe 3 times in 10 years. Their results are seldom close to Taylor.
 
Are we all misunderstanding the proper TA goal level? It's possible!
Yes. Higher TA=faster pH rise. If you are chlorinating with tricolor pucks, then you do need to keep that on the higher end because those are acidic and can crash your pH if the TA gets too low. But if you keep it around 50 or 60 the pH rise will stop rising so fast and may even stay fairly steady. And that in turn will help keep your CSI low enough to not scale. There are those that recommend using borates to help avoid scaling in the saltwater generator, but I haven’t had the need to do that
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Mdragger88
So here we go.... Me too, but as soon as I try to get it near that 70, 80 or even 90, that's when my PH keeps trying to rise correspondingly faster, and I have to add muriatic acid to keep PH down, then my TA falls again. I've been in that cycle for years.
Don’t do that anymore. Let your TA get down to 50 if needed.
 
Wow - this amazing, thank you guys. The ABC's and plenty of other posts like in poolmath says "TA level to keep the PH in balance". I guess I never appreciated what that truly meant, so I created a battle. I'll let the TA drop to 50 and keep an eye on PH, now realizing the goal is simply to have enough TA to keep PH from crashing lower which of course is bad for many reasons. I wonder if that's explained anywhere or if I just spaced on it.
:hammer:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mdragger88
Yes. Higher TA=faster pH rise. If you are chlorinating with tricolor pucks, then you do need to keep that on the higher end because those are acidic and can crash your pH if the TA gets too low. But if you keep it around 50 or 60 the pH rise will stop rising so fast and may even stay fairly steady. And that intern will help. Keep your CSI low enough to not scale. There are those that recommend using borates to help avoid scaling in the saltwater generator, but I haven’t had the need to do that
Hopefully no one here is chlorinating with pucks.
 

Enjoying this content?

Support TFP with a donation.

Give Support
Thread Status
Hello , This thread has been inactive for over 60 days. New postings here are unlikely to be seen or responded to by other members. For better visibility, consider Starting A New Thread.