Question about pipe size specified in Engineering Doc vs what the PB used

essbase

Active member
Dec 2, 2020
33
Sarasota Florida
Hi,

I have a pool/spa combo that was built in Florida over the last year and has had many issues along the way.... Thanks so much for all the help and answers provided during this journey.

I need some direction on another issue. The pool/Spa has a 3hp VS motor. at higher RPMs it starts cavitating unless it is pulling from more than one suction pipe. In example, in SPA mode the suction 3 way valve closes off the Main Drain and Skimmer, so it only pumps water from the Spa drain. When this happens and the pump is above 2750 rpm it sounds like gravel is in the pump. Same thing if only the Main Drain is open to the pump. I am not sure if I am reading the Engineering Doc correctly, but it appears to specify 2-1/2" pipe for the Branch, Trunk, Spa Suction lines. The lines that the PB ran are all 2". Can someone take a look at the attached Engineer's Calcs and tell me if they ran too small of pipe? I think that's the case but also wonder why the inspector didn't catch the issue if so. Thanks so much for everything!
 

Attachments

  • Ansi15.JPG
    Ansi15.JPG
    322.2 KB · Views: 23
  • Ansi7 A.JPG
    Ansi7 A.JPG
    359.3 KB · Views: 21
  • Ansi7 B.JPG
    Ansi7 B.JPG
    216.9 KB · Views: 66
  • Suction Valves.JPG
    Suction Valves.JPG
    255.9 KB · Views: 19
  • Drains.JPG
    Drains.JPG
    236.1 KB · Views: 22
Last edited:
Yup, the documents say 2.5" pipe should be used.

Town inspectors look if the construction meets the building codes. They don't check what is constructed versus the engineering documents for items that the building codes do not specify.

Post pics of your equipment pad and your spa showing the drains.

@mas985 my have some thoughts.
 
Yup, the documents say 2.5" pipe should be used.

Town inspectors look if the construction meets the building codes. They don't check what is constructed versus the engineering documents for items that the building codes do not specify.

Post pics of your equipment pad and your spa showing the drains.

@mas985 my have some thoughts.
Thanks Allen... Here is a picture of the Suction valves and a clip of the drains. I have 2 of these drains in both the Spa and the Pool. Thanks Again!
 

Attachments

  • Drains.JPG
    Drains.JPG
    236.1 KB · Views: 15
  • Suction Valves.JPG
    Suction Valves.JPG
    255.9 KB · Views: 15
ESS,

We need to know exactly which pump you have..

Also, we'd like to see several pics of your equipment pad.

In the Spa mode, almost every system I have seen is set up to suck all the water from the spa using a single pipe. So, it would be odd, if your pump can't run at full speed in that configuration.

Thanks,

Jim R.
 
ESS,

We need to know exactly which pump you have..

Also, we'd like to see several pics of your equipment pad.

In the Spa mode, almost every system I have seen is set up to suck all the water from the spa using a single pipe. So, it would be odd, if your pump can't run at full speed in that configuration.

Thanks,

Jim R.
Hi Jim,

I am not there or I would snap a picture of the pad. This is the pump that is installed:
3.95THP 230V INTELLIFLO VSF VARIABLE SPEED & FLOW PUMP (PUR-10-1662)
  • Product # : PUR-10-1662
  • Mfg : PENTAIR WATER POOL AND SPA INC
  • Mfg # : 011056
 
Yup, the documents say 2.5" pipe should be used.

Town inspectors look if the construction meets the building codes. They don't check what is constructed versus the engineering documents for items that the building codes do not specify.

Post pics of your equipment pad and your spa showing the drains.

@mas985 my have some thoughts.
Allen,

I am in Florida and I think the FL building code included the Ansi specs 7 & 15 for pools... Some of the requirements in the code are hard to specifically understand. but even if they do require it, I am not sure which pipe sizing they would apply from the Engineering docs. Would it be based on the Ansi spec calcs vs what the Engineer specified... (seems like if references smaller pipes and then specifies 2.5". Probably need to call the Engineering firm that the PB used and ask that question. Thanks!
 
ess,

There are thousands of those pumps (011056) that are out there running pools and Spas, and my 'pull it out of my rear' guess is that most of them are installed with 2" plumbing. Since I don't remember anyone else having this same problem, I really doubt that the pipe size is the cause of your issue.

Something else is a foot...

Thanks,

Jim R.
 

Enjoying this content?

Support TFP with a donation.

Give Support
I am in Florida and I think the FL building code included the Ansi specs 7 & 15 for pools... Some of the requirements in the code are hard to specifically understand. but even if they do require it, I am not sure which pipe sizing they would apply from the Engineering docs. Would it be based on the Ansi spec calcs vs what the Engineer specified... (seems like if references smaller pipes and then specifies 2.5". Probably need to call the Engineering firm that the PB used and ask that question. Thanks!


The ANSI calculations demonstrate that your pool meets the minimum requirements. No pool should be built to those minimum standards.

This page specifies what the engineer wanted installed.

As others have said many folks, including me, have the 011056 pump running fine with 2" suction. 2.5" suction will provide a bit better hydraulic efficiency but 2" pipe will be able to keep up with the pump.

The VSF pump will display the flow rate. It would be helpful to know what the pump is displaying for flow at various RPMs.

When you are at the house we can help you diagnose your problem further. But the use of 2" pipe is not what I would go after the pool builder for.

Do you have any pics of the pool during construction? Particularly pictures of after rebar and plumbing but before gunite?


ansi7-b-jpg.457216
 
ess,

I see that you are in Florida, the land of the dinky filters... :mrgreen:

I suspect your problem is either a very small filter or the filter is dirty from construction and plaster debris.

Thanks,

Jim R.
Jim,

Its a 150 sqft filter. I have cleaned it very often... Daily for the first couple of weeks. However, they didnt balance the pool water after plastering so the Calcium levels were really low. I have white deposits all over the glass tile and have been told the surface of the pool is rough because of this. I finally got them to add calcium and get the level up from 75 to 300 about a month after plastering. Wonder if that could cause issues with the filter flow.
 
The ANSI calculations demonstrate that your pool meets the minimum requirements. No pool should be built to those minimum standards.

This page specifies what the engineer wanted installed.

As others have said many folks, including me, have the 011056 pump running fine with 2" suction. 2.5" suction will provide a bit better hydraulic efficiency but 2" pipe will be able to keep up with the pump.

The VSF pump will display the flow rate. It would be helpful to know what the pump is displaying for flow at various RPMs.

When you are at the house we can help you diagnose your problem further. But the use of 2" pipe is not what I would go after the pool builder for.

Do you have any pics of the pool during construction? Particularly pictures of after rebar and plumbing but before gunite?


ansi7-b-jpg.457216
Thanks Allen
I will check the GPM tomorrow. Here are some shots of the pipes
 

Attachments

  • 001.JPG
    001.JPG
    848.2 KB · Views: 18
  • 004.JPG
    004.JPG
    628.3 KB · Views: 19
  • 006.JPG
    006.JPG
    675.4 KB · Views: 18
For suction, you want to keep the water velocity below 6 ft/sec. For returns, you want to keep the water velocity below 8 ft/sec.

Size.......6 ft/sec......8 ft/sec.
1.5"...........38...............51 gpm
2"..............63...............84 gpm
2.5............90.............119 gpm
3.0".........138.............184 gpm

The document says 102 gpm for spa mode which would indicate that the suction should be 3".

How long is the pipe for the suction?

How many 90s in the suction line?

You will probably need to get a vacuum gauge to measure the suction if you think that the pump is cavitating.
 
For suction, you want to keep the water velocity below 6 ft/sec. For returns, you want to keep the water velocity below 8 ft/sec.

Size.......6 ft/sec......8 ft/sec.
1.5"...........38...............51 gpm
2"..............63...............84 gpm
2.5............90.............119 gpm
3.0".........138.............184 gpm

The document says 102 gpm for spa mode which would indicate that the suction should be 3".

How long is the pipe for the suction?

How many 90s in the suction line?

You will probably need to get a vacuum gauge to measure the suction if you think that the pump is cavitating.
Hi James when I say cavitating... It seems to vibrate/growl and I can see turbulence (lots of what look like tiny bubbles) through the clear basket cover on the pump when I set the only suction on to the SPA or the Main Drain. In pool mode I can set the 3 way between the Main and Skimmer in the middle and it runs clean. If its on the main drain only it starts the cavitation. I am going to measure the length tomorrow and compare to the engineering. I think the Spa drain line has 8 - 90s ( its the one in the picture that comes out under the center of the Spa and runs into 2-90s runs a couple of feet and goes back down through 2 more 90s)... I think the Main Drain has 5 or 6. More than what they listed on the Engineering.
 

Enjoying this content?

Support TFP with a donation.

Give Support
Thread Status
Hello , This thread has been inactive for over 60 days. New postings here are unlikely to be seen or responded to by other members. For better visibility, consider Starting A New Thread.