Thank you all for responding. I never knew this type of motor existed. Very interesting!
Are the claims true regarding flow dropping 50% but power consumption dropping by 75% in low speed true?
I think you might be mixing up 2-speed and variable speed motors. Two speed motors are induction motors which inherently consume more power but they can still result in power savings if you're able to run the lower speed a significant amount of time. Variable speed motors are permanent magnet motors. These can reduce power dramatically because you have essentially infinite speed choice and they are more efficient since they don't have to create the magnetic field. Even though they are way more expensive the added cost is usually paid out in a year or less. Here's a great report that explains in more detail.
I hope this is helpful.
Chris
That is not really a possible scenario because there is no two speed pump (residential pool pump) that will produce the same flow rate as a single speed on low speed. But theoretically if there were, then the single speed would be more efficient because a two speed's low speed winding is about 50% less efficient than a primary winding.
Yes positive about the number and the motor design. For a residential pool pump motors there is separate winding for low speed that uses finer wire which has more I2R losses and efficiency drops by ~50%.
The Dahlander is a 3-phase motor design.
They are not a Dahlander design.Two speed and single speed pump motors are single phase induction motors. Single speed motors have a primary 2-pole winding and a secondary 2-pole starter winding, 90 degrees out of phase which is why a capacitor is required for the starter winding. Two speed motors have the same windings as a single speed but on top of those windings is a 4-pole winding for the lower speed. They have to pack it all in the same motor profile so smaller gauge wire is used for the low speed winding which is why the efficiency suffers.
Hi Chris,
No, I'm not mixing them up.
My assumption based on what I've read is that it's not the motor saving energy but rather the pump. I guess because the pressure of the entire system drops substantially.
Mark,@cj133, your are correct in that a two speed motor pump will reduce energy use by ~75% on low speed. A VS pump would save even more at the same flow rate.
I didn't think the rating for the Intex filters was all that high. The largest I have seen is 3000 GPH which is only 50 GPM. But the true performance is lower than that when you add the lines and skimmers and returns. Probably closer to 40 GPM.