I'm seeing significant and consistent differences on TA and CH tests with my new TFT kit compared to testing by Leslie's.
Today, results were as follows, which is very consistent with pool store tests over the last few months and the TFT kit over the last month since I got the kit:
Test -- TFT vs. Pool Store
FC -- 3 vs. 3
CC -- 0 vs. 0
pH -- 7.7 vs. 7.6
TA -- 50 vs. 90
CH -- 475 vs. 275
CYA -- 40 vs. 50
Either way, the CSI is about the same. Also, I did just check TA with my Pentair test kit that came from the pool builder. It's at 50. So, maybe the pool store is really that far off every time over the last few months.
But, I'm wondering if I got bad bottles for the TA and CH. Any thoughts?
If my TA is truly 50, which I lean toward thinking that is the case, I'm really concerned about accuracy on the calcium because if it is 275, then I have close to -0.3 on the CSI when my ph is around 7.5.
Today, results were as follows, which is very consistent with pool store tests over the last few months and the TFT kit over the last month since I got the kit:
Test -- TFT vs. Pool Store
FC -- 3 vs. 3
CC -- 0 vs. 0
pH -- 7.7 vs. 7.6
TA -- 50 vs. 90
CH -- 475 vs. 275
CYA -- 40 vs. 50
Either way, the CSI is about the same. Also, I did just check TA with my Pentair test kit that came from the pool builder. It's at 50. So, maybe the pool store is really that far off every time over the last few months.
But, I'm wondering if I got bad bottles for the TA and CH. Any thoughts?
If my TA is truly 50, which I lean toward thinking that is the case, I'm really concerned about accuracy on the calcium because if it is 275, then I have close to -0.3 on the CSI when my ph is around 7.5.