- Jan 4, 2016
- 5,392
- Pool Size
- 44000
- Surface
- Plaster
- Chlorine
- Salt Water Generator
Not failing. Learning. It's a tricky pool. Not sure what to say. You're smart, curious and thorough, and from my vantage point, you have a good handle on TFPC and the SLAM.
So back to reality... SLAM it again, same criteria and process you learned before.
I hope we get new suggestions from experts that are helpful, but in the meantime, I think there's two simple things working against you.
1. The cover - parks itself underwater, has slats that are translucent with openings on the end. That means biological activity inside the slats is possible. We've improved things by getting flow in the cover vault under the pool floor, but this may still be a wrinkle.
2. High bather load relative to pool volume - Your last SLAM may have been perfect. There's no reason to believe otherwise. The criteria were met. The high bather load (7 people six hours) would result in chlorine extinction of (very roughly) 200 grams (4 g FC per person-hour plus 2 wees at 20 g FC each). In your water volume, that's 10 ppm FC. Maybe the pool was just a tad too low a tad too often.
The pool needs SLAMing (continue the track we're on) and then management practices that never allow FC to go below 7.5% of CYA.
I like 7.5% better for now. People with clean pools get away with 5% of CYA with SWCGs. Good for them. You've got the auto-cover that gets flooded and emptied once or twice a day. You want that chlorine (inside the slat) to have a very small job to do, because it doesn't get replenished, other than from CYA reserve, so it probably gets depleted inside the cover slats.
I've talked about this before, so I hate to say it again, but I agree with Dave that more frequent testing is important until your program is settled in. Your logging is excellent, but I would not consider less than every other day until you're happy with the pool. I do believe, because of the research you're doing, the questions you're asking, and your efforts to date, that you have an exemplary grasp of TFPC.
You have not wasted one second of my time, and I don't accept ya apologies, mate. None needed. Bring it on. Let's get this pool sparkly and easy to look after. It's a very interesting pool (submerged auto-cover) with top specs and beautiful finish. Lots of people will gain from your experience. Maybe we can write a 10-post thread when it's all over and everything is running great.
So back to reality... SLAM it again, same criteria and process you learned before.
I hope we get new suggestions from experts that are helpful, but in the meantime, I think there's two simple things working against you.
1. The cover - parks itself underwater, has slats that are translucent with openings on the end. That means biological activity inside the slats is possible. We've improved things by getting flow in the cover vault under the pool floor, but this may still be a wrinkle.
2. High bather load relative to pool volume - Your last SLAM may have been perfect. There's no reason to believe otherwise. The criteria were met. The high bather load (7 people six hours) would result in chlorine extinction of (very roughly) 200 grams (4 g FC per person-hour plus 2 wees at 20 g FC each). In your water volume, that's 10 ppm FC. Maybe the pool was just a tad too low a tad too often.
The pool needs SLAMing (continue the track we're on) and then management practices that never allow FC to go below 7.5% of CYA.
I like 7.5% better for now. People with clean pools get away with 5% of CYA with SWCGs. Good for them. You've got the auto-cover that gets flooded and emptied once or twice a day. You want that chlorine (inside the slat) to have a very small job to do, because it doesn't get replenished, other than from CYA reserve, so it probably gets depleted inside the cover slats.
I've talked about this before, so I hate to say it again, but I agree with Dave that more frequent testing is important until your program is settled in. Your logging is excellent, but I would not consider less than every other day until you're happy with the pool. I do believe, because of the research you're doing, the questions you're asking, and your efforts to date, that you have an exemplary grasp of TFPC.
You have not wasted one second of my time, and I don't accept ya apologies, mate. None needed. Bring it on. Let's get this pool sparkly and easy to look after. It's a very interesting pool (submerged auto-cover) with top specs and beautiful finish. Lots of people will gain from your experience. Maybe we can write a 10-post thread when it's all over and everything is running great.