I just checked and good schedule 80 unions are spendy most places at the moment. I'd rather see you use a few good ones, than buy 15 cheapo ones that will need replacing.Ouch! I'll stock up on spares.
I just checked and good schedule 80 unions are spendy most places at the moment. I'd rather see you use a few good ones, than buy 15 cheapo ones that will need replacing.Ouch! I'll stock up on spares.
All the pieces above ground seem to be schedule 40. There's not enough pipe length for the line to and from the pool to see what kind it is. Is there another way to check?I just checked and good schedule 80 unions are spendy most places at the moment. I'd rather see you use a few good ones, than buy 15 cheapo ones that will need replacing.
I don't know what that mystery component is. It doesn't look like a check valve, though it's in the right spot for one, right before the tab feeder. @1poolman1 has run into just about everything in his work. Thoughts?What could it be, then? That stump on a tee stumps me
There are cams you can rent or buy that can travel down underground pipes.Is there another way to check?
Could have be an injection port, an anode, or a water bond.What could it be, then? That stump on a tee stumps me
Yeah that's good. Get schedule 80 unions. The standard HomeDepot ones are mostly crud.All the pieces above ground seem to be schedule 40
Clearly the teeth are stripped on both the handle and valve cover, so the set screw probably cant do what its supposed to do. This is the exact reason to use rebuildable valves. Everything but the valve body is replaceable in minutes. Pop those screws and put the new lid and handle on.Is it me not having found sweet spot or is it some damage in the valve?
Don’t know, maybe a stub for a temperature probe? Or maybe it’s just an odd looking valve. Doesn’t seem like it could seal very well with that little black pivot.What could it be, then? That stump on a tee stumps me
See, now I wouldn't use unions there. You have room for plenty of pipe, which could be cut a half dozen times and put back together with couplers. Unions are less reliable and cost a lot more. Unions are more appropriate for a pump that has to come in from the cold each winter season. I don't think you need unions for every instance of an off chance potential some-day repair. But if you want, it's really no harm, just slightly less reliable. Don't overthink all this. Eliminate some elbows, plot it out so you can replace most everything with couplers some day, leave enough pipe for the SWG we're going to talk you into, and save the dough for the ever-increasing expense of chemicals. IMO...I think I'd want to have a union between pump and flowmeter and then between flowmeter and mpv, and unions between MPV and actual return line going into the ground.