A few years ago I posted asking about pump runtime and it was determined that I will get the necessary water turnover per 24 hours just running the pump about 6-8 hours per day, which I split up in two sections.
This year for some reason I seem to be going through a little bit more chlorine than previous summers yet my chemistry remains the same. Specifically I was able to get by with about 30 ounces bleach per day, but now requires about 40 ounces and I saw some algae and so began the shocking procedure.
Perhaps the algae (because it was so small and left untreated, I honestly think it is more of a plaster issue?) was the cause for going through more chlorine and now that I am shocking to eliminate the algae my chlorine usage may return to the lower levels I had in previous summers?
But I was wondering if the thinking is sound regarding: "the more hours the water gets filtered, the less likely you are to run into algae/chlorine issues". I realize that the chlorine chemically goes after the organics, and that filtering is an issue of getting what is possible to be lodged in the filter instead of in your water. So it is sound reasoning to say that the more stuff lodged in your filter instead of being in the water will result in lower chlorine usage? The goal is we want minimal chlorine usage that will get the job done, and we want the least amount runtime that will get the job done. But I'm wondering if I am skimping and should add some runtime?
Thanks
This year for some reason I seem to be going through a little bit more chlorine than previous summers yet my chemistry remains the same. Specifically I was able to get by with about 30 ounces bleach per day, but now requires about 40 ounces and I saw some algae and so began the shocking procedure.
Perhaps the algae (because it was so small and left untreated, I honestly think it is more of a plaster issue?) was the cause for going through more chlorine and now that I am shocking to eliminate the algae my chlorine usage may return to the lower levels I had in previous summers?
But I was wondering if the thinking is sound regarding: "the more hours the water gets filtered, the less likely you are to run into algae/chlorine issues". I realize that the chlorine chemically goes after the organics, and that filtering is an issue of getting what is possible to be lodged in the filter instead of in your water. So it is sound reasoning to say that the more stuff lodged in your filter instead of being in the water will result in lower chlorine usage? The goal is we want minimal chlorine usage that will get the job done, and we want the least amount runtime that will get the job done. But I'm wondering if I am skimping and should add some runtime?
Thanks