That is the argument in Australia and why they require the gas trap.The gas trap is probably safer by answering “Is there gas accumulating so the cell must shutdown?”
If the purpose is to prevent dangerous gas accumulation then the gas trap is probably a better and more reliable method.
It works, but I think that it requires a goofy plumbing design and it might require too much flow.
The gas sensing tang is on the side of the cell close to the top.
The power supply monitors it for voltage.
If it is covered with water, the power supply will see voltage when the cell is powered.
It will simply pick up the stray voltage from the electrodes in the water.
The gas sensing tang is simply a piece of titanium welded to a wire there are no moving parts so it is about as reliable as you can get.
In Australia It is a code requirement to have a gas sensor (like the paddle switch, or our gas sensing tang) but it must also have a gas trap as well.
There is no code requirement to have a gas trap in North America.
When a filter explodes and it takes out half of a house and kills someone I am sure that we will see a requirement here as well.
Safety features of a salt chlorination system
Hi Mark, Can you explain the underlined section below for me, does the water flow detection work because of the absence of water & the presence of gas, all off the back of a single sensor or detector? Or are these two different detectors, i.e. one for water flow & one for gas? Safety features...www.watermaid.ca
Last edited: