[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]A quote from the interwebs: Look at a piece of EU regulation called “Adaptations to Technical Progress”, specifically the 30th and 31st ATP’s. In this legislation the group of chemicals known as Borates (including Borax) were reclassified as “[/FONT]Reprotoxic Category 2[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]“. This classification suggests that the product is harmful to the reproductive functions of humans in high doses, and means the substance must carry the skull and crossbones symbol. The reclassification came about because of a study carried out on pregnant rats who were exposed to high doses of borates [1]. The study suggests that Boric Acid is harmful when exposed regularly to concentrations of more that 5.5%."[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]So it would appear I have pregnant rats to blame (and the EU) for the lack of borax! I guess if I swallow a kilo of borax I could see it being toxic. But other than that its just bureaucratic nonsense!
[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]So it would appear I have pregnant rats to blame (and the EU) for the lack of borax! I guess if I swallow a kilo of borax I could see it being toxic. But other than that its just bureaucratic nonsense!
[/FONT]