OK, ajw is right. Well, at least about the part where I should not have attempted to give him the benefit of the doubt about what he intended to say. My bad.
To the OP, this is a teaching site, not a place for squabbling between posters who may or may not know what they're talking about. So for my part in that, I apologize. When it doubt, you can safely ignore me and any other un-credentialled poster, and defer to the TFP experts, of which Marty (mknauss ) is one. You can tell us apart by the badges displayed to the left of each post. Marty was very helpful in mentoring me when I first stumbled on to this site, and bless his heart he continues to, despite my rantings! His advice and knowledge are beyond reproach.
To address your original question about it, and summarize the ensuing attempts to answer it: The disinfection and benefits provided by the chlorine generated by an SWG are not happening within the body of the SWG any measurable amount more than anywhere else in the pool or its plumbing. Is there more chlorine at one end of an active SWG, and the pipe following it, than elsewhere in pool? Surely (but barely). Does that little bit of extra chlorine goodness work any better, or faster inside the SWG than elsewhere? No, not after the pool water has reached its target FC level.
All the water is doing the disinfecting. The water that enters an SWG is already disinfected! If anything is in the water that needs disinfecting, that disinfection occurs in the pool, in the skimmer pipe, in the filter, before and after the SWG, etc. The SWG's function is to keep all the water's FC level even and effective, throughout the pool, throughout the day, not blast the portion of it within the SWG. JimMarshall, in his post #23, answered your question correctly.
I think most here would agree, if you make the switch to a saltwater pool and an SWG, you'll be glad you did. And you won't have to reduce your CYA any further!
