I captured these wattage figures a year or two ago in just the Pool setting (no solar), but they should be close. I'll re-capture tomorrow with each configuration at 20gpm.What is the power usage at 20 gpm for each configuration?
I'm not sure I understand the advice here. The SWCG can NEVER be able to be powered while the pump is not running. I there's power there when the pump is off it just wired wrong and asking for a chlorine gas explosion. With a SWCG it isn't necessary to have a check valve as when its off nothing is there that'll affect the heater. If it was a chlorinator that would be a different story then you'd need a cv.If the SWCG is generating when the pump shuts down, you have highly chlorinated water in that vertical pipe. The hot water rises and sits at the top (most likely causing the scale at that end), and the cooler water falls bringing highly chlorinated water into the heater.
Let's say the pump is running, and the SWCG is set for 30% cycle time.I'm not sure I understand the advice here. The SWCG can NEVER be able to be powered while the pump is not running. I there's power there when the pump is off it just wired wrong and asking for a chlorine gas explosion. With a SWCG it isn't necessary to have a check valve as when its off nothing is there that'll affect the heater. If it was a chlorinator that would be a different story then you'd need a cv.
Back in post #4 you had noted that the SWCG was not in proper direction per the Jandy manual. Did you decide to change that to the other vertical pipe or put it on horizontal pipe?I installed the FlowVis Flowmeter and at 1400rpm the pump is only running at 7-8gpm. The Jandy manual for the SWCG says to run a minimum of 20gpm. However the low flow sensor doesn't come on until 1200rpm and everything I have read on the forum about RPM for SWCG is that you should go as low as you can until you get the low flow light to turn on and then increase the RPM by 100-200rpm, hence using as little electricity as possible. That is how I ended up at 1400rpm. It seemed to produce enough chlorine, but I am obviously now trying to analyze all the variables since the cell is scaling quite quickly (not on the plates, but the electrodes/grate), even though the saturation index is not terribly out of whack. Going to use a calibrated salt/tds sensor tomorrow to get a more accurate reading of that.
here is the following GPM breakdown at various RPMs.
NO SOLAR heating
Pool:
1400rpm=7-8gpm
1600rpm=10gpm
1800rpm=11-12gpm
1900rpm=14-15gpm
2000rpm=19gpm
2050rpm=20gpm
2200rpm=23-24gpm
2850rpm("high" speed)=39-40gpm
Spa mode:
1400rpm=7-8gpm
2050rpm=20gpm
2150rpm=21gpm
Spillover:
3100rpm= 42-43gpm
WITH SOLAR heating (half of the array is on 1st story, half on 2nd story)
Pool:
2200rpm=19gpm
2300rpm=20gpm
Note, I thought it would have taken a lot more RPM to push water up to second story vs not having solar turned on. Looks like only a difference of ~200rpm to get to 20gpm
You are searching for a problem that does not exist. The bulk water in swcg is just not that ‘highly’ chlorinated nor high pH.but, the highly chlorinated, elevated temp, high pH water is still in the pipe .
You are searching for a problem that does not exist. The bulk water in swcg is just not that ‘highly’ chlorinated nor high pH.
As soon as the cell is de-energized, the pH will very quickly go back to normal because the flow rate through the cell is very fast.
Wow! Thanks for stepping into this conversation @JoyfulNoiseSo that's taking what I said out of context and making huge assumptions about what's happening inside the cell. Let me now clarify -
@mknauss is mostly correct - all of the chemical reactions are happening at or near the cell plate surface. Borates act as a strong buffer when the pH is close to 9.0 (that is roughly the pKa value of the borate/boric acid equilibrium). So, when the cell is generating chlorine and producing hydroxide anions, some of that rise in pH is going to be absorbed by the presence of borates. That helps right in the vicinity of the plate surface. Also, calcium ions will be in equilibrium with the carbonate and bicarbonate as well as borates so any scaling that occurs will be a mixture of various calcium precipitates. Calcium borate tends to be mushier and easier to remove than calcium carbonate. But again, this is only at the surface of the plate. As soon as the cell is de-energized, the pH will very quickly go back to normal because the flow rate through the cell is very fast.
What causes scale at the leading edge of the cell (the exit) is a little complicated but it is due to the fact that the electric field produced by the cell when it is running gets protruded outwards along the flow path of the electrolyte. This protruding electric field and electric current tends to cause higher current densities at the edges and can even result in a current path to ground if the plates are not sufficiently offset. All of this results in the formation of scale at that edge preferentially to any place in the cell. This type of scaling is a very common feature in flow cells.
I doubt "flushing the cell" will have any noticeable effect. The OP might try reducing the pump speed and flow rate through the cell to see if that helps at all.
Gotcha, I guess I did take it out of context ... for reference, this is to what I was referring ... where you mention the main cause of the calcium scaling is due to the high pH of the water inside the generator. My mistake, and I apologize for any confusion I may have caused.
Out of curiosity, what about when the flow through the cell stops at the same time the cell is de-energized? Does the pH of the water inside the cell go back to normal through some other mechanism when there is no flow?
Wow! Thanks for stepping into this conversation @JoyfulNoise
So you are actually saying the more you reduce the flow through the cell the less scaling should take place at the leading edge of the cell (the exit)? The flow was at like 6-8gpm @1400rpm so I was assuming I couldn't/shouldn't go much lower.
Speaking of GPM, what are your thoughts as to why Jandy recommends a minimum flowrate of 20gpm? Before reading your response I was thinking by increasing the flow rate to 20gpm+ maybe the scaling wouldn't have a chance to settle because the water is blowing by it much quicker.
And do you think the vertical orientation of the cell has anything to do with it? Once again that orientation is not listed in the Jandy manual. They show it in a downward (exit on bottom) configuration, but I can't think of a reason why that would really make much of a difference.
And lastly, if borates make for a more mushy scale, then maybe I should incorporate borates into the chemistry so the scaling doesn't stick as much and the water flow would tent to carry it off the metal?
Thanks!
I alway run a slow skim program (very low speed) that brackets my actual POOL mode when the SWG is running.
Ok. I will try 20GPM for a while and see what happens.Maybe in your case try running the SWG at higher speeds to see if there’s a difference. Perhaps the slower speed is the cause. Most SWGs have 15-20 GPM as their flow rate spec. I would stay close to that.
@HermanTX , I haven't replumbed the SWCG, but I may put it in a horizontal position at some point if GPM adjustment doesn't correct the scalingBack in post #4 you had noted that the SWCG was not in proper direction per the Jandy manual. Did you decide to change that to the other vertical pipe or put it on horizontal pipe?