Hello everyone,
I was ready to pull the trigger on a Circupool SWG especially with the labor day upgrade going on right now. BUT, I have a Hayward E Command 4 controller that has the capability to "run" a Hayward SWG. According to the Hayward manual, the E command 4 can run an "external" salt cell. It looks like it is very limited control and I would still need the Aqua Rite controller and T-15 cell. It looks like I would have to capability to change the percent output to the cell from the E Command 4, but all other functions would still be controlled by the Aqua Rite. Is this correct?
I'm not sure there's much of an advantage to going with a Hayward SWG with what appears to be limited functionality from the E command 4. I guess one advantage would be that I could change the desired output % remotely from my smart phone etc, but not much else.
Does this sound correct and is there really any advantage to going with a Hayward SWG when paired with the E command 4? I hope this makes sense....
Thank you!
I was ready to pull the trigger on a Circupool SWG especially with the labor day upgrade going on right now. BUT, I have a Hayward E Command 4 controller that has the capability to "run" a Hayward SWG. According to the Hayward manual, the E command 4 can run an "external" salt cell. It looks like it is very limited control and I would still need the Aqua Rite controller and T-15 cell. It looks like I would have to capability to change the percent output to the cell from the E Command 4, but all other functions would still be controlled by the Aqua Rite. Is this correct?
I'm not sure there's much of an advantage to going with a Hayward SWG with what appears to be limited functionality from the E command 4. I guess one advantage would be that I could change the desired output % remotely from my smart phone etc, but not much else.
Does this sound correct and is there really any advantage to going with a Hayward SWG when paired with the E command 4? I hope this makes sense....
Thank you!