I am going to post about it in the VIP section later but the short answer is no, and never again.
I had a spinal infection twice and was hospitalized twice and the second time the cell completely failed with about a year left on the warranty when I was in the hospital and I returned to a green pool. I was in no condition to try to make a claim for months after that so... I dunno... So no. It's something that has to be monitored at least every few days. I think the only way I will go back to it is if I can plumb in a water softener somehow into the fill. The house plumbing won't allow it but I am considering an apartment sized unit outside in the equipment shed since we really don't freeze here in the winter if stuff is properly shielded.
I was sick for several months and I am only now starting to recover the pool. Once I get it physically clean I will drain it as much as I can and probably go back to LC at least for a year. Our terrible fill water in Tucson is what did it, and I would probably destroy a replacement cell in 2 to 2.5 years again unless I take care of the calcium levels in the fill water. In an area with soft water fill, it's almost set and forget though. I also had a display board go out on the control. I do have the replacement for it and I did get a discount under warranty for it, but didn't get it in because I received it right before round one.
I am going to probably end up coming back here and be active again as the TFP system really is the only way to have crystal clear water... but I can tell you that you have to check on the cell at least once a week. This was a 12 day hospitization we were talking about too. Not a month.
So sorry to hear about your health issues, Fred, and I hope you're doing better. But if I may...
A pool is a complicated thing, and needs constant monitoring. No level of automation can reliably sustain a pool for 12 days without supervision (key word being "reliably"). And of course no pool without any automation can be left unattended for 12 days either. At any given minute of any given day, regardless of the age of any component of your pool, there can be a failure. In the heat of summer, a sanitation failure (whether that be automated or manual) can go about two or three days before an algae outbreak can occur. That is just a fact of pool ownership. A shell failure (a leak) can sometimes go for only a few minutes, or hours, or a day, depending on the leak, before your expensive pump or your landscaping or the pool itself, could be damaged. Etc.
The list of things that could go wrong, and the consequences, are almost endless. So pool ownership means deciding on a level of risk tolerance and a level of commitment based on that risk tolerance. My pool is fully automated, so I can theoretically go for weeks without attending it. Nonetheless, I installed cams over my pool and my pad and check on both at least once a day, more, more often than not. Currently, I'm monitoring potential problems with both my filter and my auto-leveling system, and so I'm checking both several times a day.
Any expectation that you should be able to leave your pool unattended for 12 days (or more or less), or that an SWG could provide that, is just not realistic. I suspect new pool owners, or those that buy a house with a pool having never managed one before (like me), comes with expectations that are quickly dashed. A pool is a huge responsibility, and a huge expense, even if you get one "for free" like I did when I bought my house.
The automation I applied to my pool minimizes the amount of work it requires, but hasn't, and won't, reduce the daily task of monitoring it. It's been said here many times: a pool is like a pet. You don't have to play with it every day, but you do have to take care of it every day.
If you don't have a back up plan in place should you be unable to monitor your pool daily, then you have to be prepared for the consequences. The presence or absence of an SWG doesn't have any bearing on that fact, at all.