Do I need concrete under pavers-Zone 7B Pros v Cons

Feb 20, 2017
28
Asheville, NC
Hi all,

I am trying to make heads or tails as to whether we need to pour concrete under travertine pavers we will be using for our pool deck. I know that we would need to use 2" thick pavers if gravel/sand set and we can do 1.25" thick if over concrete. I have read so many conflicting things and it seems a lot is dependent on location. I am in the mountains, about 2400' elevation, zone 7B. We do get freezing weather so I have found Premium grade travertine that passes Frost/Freeze tests from Travertine Mart.

I've been told that I need to use 2" thick travertine, even if over concrete slab.

Pool builder is not doing the patio, but they say we need to pour concrete under the pavers. Then I have read that we can either mortar the pavers or just use polymer sand to set them onto the concrete. I have also read that mortaring the travertine can lead to the pavers cracking as the ground and concrete moves it puts pressure on the pavers which then can't move and then will crack. I have also been told that only the outer edge of pavers should be mortared to hold it in around the edges and then sand set the middle.

I have also been told(by someone bidding on the concrete) that I need 5" thick concrete and 4" is no where near sufficient. If I do concrete, I would do fibre mesh and make sure to have rebar in middle of concrete pour, and plenty of relief cuts. I do have the slope specified for where we want to direct the water flow.

Then there is the advice of not pouring concrete over where the plumbing/electrical lines. This seems like it would make a quite odd shaped concrete pad/s to avoid those lines. Then we would have to exactly match up the level of the concrete set pavers with the gravel/sand set pavers.

We are planning on pouring concrete for a walkway and 21 steps down the side yard from the main level of the house(screened porch) to the lower level grade which is where the pool is going. So even if we didn't pour concrete for under the entire patio, we would still need it for that area. I was planning on using the 1.25" travertine in French pattern on the walkways to match the patio and bordering the steps with the matching coping/stair treads.

I have also read that new concrete needs to cure for a month before laying anything on top. If so, I definitely need to plan for a break in this time to do other hardscape/landscape items.

I just don't know what to think when I am only being told things from tradespeople who want to sell to me. We live in a somewhat expensive area and have experienced vendors upselling us the same thing based on the new property we are building at vs our current house. There's a running joke about the 'neighborhood tax', would be funnier if it weren't true!

Help, please and thank you,
Juls
 
My neighbor who does landscaping/masonry told me that most everyone here abandoned the tradtional compacted base for all patios/walkways. The labor saved in ground prep covers the cost of the concrete. The cement crew needs very little ground prep as the slab can and will crack, but nobody will ever see it under the pavers.

4 inch was plenty IMO. They moved the pallets of bricks with a bobcat all over the slab, making 100 multiple point turns all day. If we assume the pallet was the tradidional 'ton of bricks', and the skid steer weighed the average 7500 lbs, the 4 inch slab took 9500 lbs in the footprint of the loaded bobcat just fine. This was a couple days after the pour, so no need to wait. Total garbage on that point.

Its also garbage about covering the plumbing. It wont matter for 50+ years for the overwhelimg majoriry of people. It would take a few hours to jackhammer *if* you ever needed and you're already paying a small fortune at that point with lots of labor costs. 3 more hours is a joke.

They contract out the cement work so they'd rather get the labor costs from you to do it the old fadhioned way. Their bias is pretty evident IMO.

My stones were laid directly onto my slab and polymeric sand filled the joints. I will never go back to ants digging out the paver base.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kimkats
Thanks, newdude! So if we are to do pavers on top of concrete, it seems like they should not be mortared down, but set with polymeric sand. Avoiding ants would be reason enough for me, however concrete and labor is very expensive where I am.

I think it is very important to recognize geographical labor costs. There is no way we could say in our area that the labor saved in ground prep covers the cost of the concrete. The labor to set the pavers is by far the most expensive part from what I have seen, about double the cost per sqft of the concrete.

So then based on your answer, it seems like there isn't necessarily a right or wrong way, just pros and cons to both methods. It is interesting that you are saying we could set the travertine soon after. It does make sense to me that if the pavers are just set with sand, then they aren't adhered to the concrete and when the concrete cracks, the pavers shouldn't crack with it.

What about the travertine pavers that are on the walkway and steps? Would those be polymeric sand set also and is that enough for the edges to not shift off due to the slope required for drainage?

Thanks!
Juls
 
I think it is very important to recognize geographical labor costs. There is no way we could say in our area that the labor
in ground prep covers the cost of the concrete.
That depends if they are laying a base for pavers, or laying a concrete patio which needs traditional ground prep. Prep for a concrete patio is every bit as labor intensive. When the cracks don't matter because they are under the pavers, that's where the labor is saved.
it seems like they should not be mortared down, but set with polymeric sand
Some by me still use a sand base on the slab and I'm not a fan of those because ants are gonna ant. If the slab is smooth, the pavers can go directly on it, then polymer sand between the pavers to lock them from wiggling.
So then based on your answer, it seems like there isn't necessarily a right or wrong way, just pros and cons to both methods.
Exactly. I had it done both ways. After seeing the pavers over a slab, if never go back to needing to reset the stones every 10 years from settling.
What about the travertine pavers that are on the walkway and steps? Would those be polymeric sand set also and is that enough for the edges to not shift off due to the slope required for drainage?
My guys do a border that is held with construction adhesive so the pavers can't shift at the sides. The skinny side of my patio is basically a walkway and you'll get the idea.

Screenshot_20240624_142745_Gallery.jpg
 
Thanks tommelton and new dude,

Next question about the concrete pad. The first quote is from a company I found by googling local companies near me that has high ratings on google. The second company is who poured our home that had several mistakes although they did fix them. First company is roughly half the cost of the second. Am I missing something major here, or am I comparing apples to apples? I have a third verbal quote that is price wise in-between but closer to the less expensive option.

Juls
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2024-06-24 at 5.20.44 PM.png
    Screenshot 2024-06-24 at 5.20.44 PM.png
    77.8 KB · Views: 15
  • Screenshot 2024-06-24 at 5.21.28 PM.png
    Screenshot 2024-06-24 at 5.21.28 PM.png
    233.7 KB · Views: 15
#1 seems more detailed I would have assumed it was the more expensive one. And it also seems like they are building you a legit patio which you wouldn't need to cover.

They poured mine right on the dirt/grass with no gravel and did not broom finish it or cut control joints. It's literally just a big slab.

Screenshot_20240624_175547_Gallery.jpg
 

Enjoying this content?

Support TFP with a donation.

Give Support
Well I just heard back from the landscaper who is now recommending 5" thick concrete under the pavers because we have "disturbed soil" and are on a slope. This will be a few thousand more even from the option #2. We haven't signed on with the landscaper, but they are recommended by our builder. Our builder wants us to use the landscaper for laying concrete as well as laying the pavers, but they are really subbing it all out. They would just be able to oversee all the details of gettin it all to line up with coping, correct height to steps, slopes for drainage, etc. I guess there is some benefit to having it all for one company, but now I don't know what benefit we are getting from 5" vs 4" thick concrete. We are building our home so I guess the side and lower yard that the patio is on is disturbed because it has been graded. We have not brought fill dirt in, but the home has been under construction for almost two years. Is this another upsell, or is it a legit concern that the ground hasn't settled enough naturally that the extra 1" of concrete will mitigate?
 
Thread Status
Hello , This thread has been inactive for over 60 days. New postings here are unlikely to be seen or responded to by other members. For better visibility, consider Starting A New Thread.