The fastest injection rate at 20 GPM of water flow is about 0.26 lb per minute CO2 to avoid oversaturating the water.
I've definitely found I need more than the free version of ChatGPT so I pay a monthly fee. I've used it to write a very simple pool control and replacement for my Rainbird that bit the dust early using ESP32. Nowhere near as powerful as the RPi devices but also only $6 or so for the chip. Had to add a relay board but total on parts was less than $20. I did a little surgery on the Rainbird box and easily fit the 5v power supply, ESP 32 and 8 ch relay board inside. Plus, I really hated the Rainbird phone interface software - very clunky. Looking forward to try Claude. Also, loving the fact this old guy that last wrote software in Fortran almost 50 years ago now can get ChatGPT to write it and I just have to tweak it a little but it works.I use the free versions.
Sometimes ChatGPT does better and sometimes Claude does better.
The paid versions are supposed to be a lot better.
That is very, very helpful. Thanks much! I think all I need is about 1.5 # per day but this is very rough approximation.The fastest injection rate at 20 GPM of water flow is about 0.26 lb per minute CO2 to avoid oversaturating the water.
Flow rate is about 25 gpm but I can raise/lower with the vs pump. Injection rate of CO2 is .05 lb per sec.Watch the returns to see if any gas bubbles out.
If the cell is on, you will get hydrogen gas, so make sure the cell is off when checking for bubbles.
What is the flow rate of water and what is the injection rate of carbon dioxide?
That's 3 lb per minute, so it seems a little high to me, but I don't really know for sure how much can be added efficiently.Injection rate of CO2 is .05 lb per sec.
That is 1.3 lb in 26 seconds.Injection rate of CO2 is .05 lb per sec.
In my opinion, that is way too fast and most will not dissolve..047#/sec
Interesting. Their start up manual says to start with 15 SCFH which I calculate to be ~1.7#/D. No discussion about how pool size impacts this but at least it's in the ballpark of calculations and matches up pretty closely with the CO2 equivalent of my muriatic acid consumption.
With proper injection, the efficiency should be over 90%, but your rate is way too high and the efficiency is probably below 10%.I think all I need is about 1.5 # per day but this is very rough approximation.
.047#/sec is 10 times too high.The max injection should be about 0.26 lb per minute or about 0.004 lb per second.
What is the calculation?I'm assuming choke flow through the 1/4" tubing. 2.83#/min. .047#/sec
You can't compare CO2 directly to muriatic acid.the CO2 equivalent of my muriatic acid consumption.
My system is pretty basic at the moment. Flow is only limited by choke flow rate in 1/4" tube. I will add an orifice to limit by a factor of 10. TA has been reducing since refill with well water several months ago. Latest readings have been about 80. I'll check the fill water later today. I add about 60 gal/day due to evaporation. Last two CH readings have been right at min (250 ppm) which is the same as the fill water - pretty hard Florida well water.With proper injection, the efficiency should be over 90%, but your rate is way too high and the efficiency is probably below 10%.
If you can keep the Carbon Dioxide Level below 1 ppm, that should minimize the loss of CO2.
I would keep the pH at 8.0 to 8.3 to keep the CO2 level as low as possible.
.047#/sec is 10 times too high.
What is the calculation?
You can't compare CO2 directly to muriatic acid.
You need to know if the pH rise is due to CO2 loss and/or to plaster loss.
CO2 loss results in pH rise with no TA or calcium hardness rise.
Plaster loss results in pH, TA and CH rise.
What is happening with the TA and CH over time?
That is with a controller that starts and stops the flow based on the pH.Their start up manual says to start with 15 SCFH which I calculate to be ~1.7#/D.
That is 1.72 lb per hour or 41.184 lb per day.Their start up manual says to start with 15 SCFH which I calculate to be ~1.7#/D.