Casey,
Just a few modifications to what Waste drew of what I had suggested (btw thanks for drawing that Waste). You can keep the “deep†return in the shallow end if you want and it may actually help circulation, but I would put it on the opposite wall from where it is currently located. Having a return which is counter rotational to the flow could present a problem in the shallow end. In the deep end, you can put the return deep enough where it probably doesn't matter much (although I would still align it with the circulation) but in the shallow end, I would keep the return in the direction of the general circulation which is counter clockwise.
I was wondering if it should go on the opposite wall. Thanks for clarifying that. Would it be better to just move the low returns in the deep end tooon the other side then? If so, I can do that. There's no sense in messing with the circulation.
Also, for the steps, you might consider staggering the two returns so they don’t face each other and you can also make them at slightly different levels. So one of the returns could be at the level of the first step and between the first and second steps and second return could be lower between the second and third steps. This would ensure that all steps get at least some of the dirt blown off.
Gotcha. I think I have to pre drill those myself.
Also, where do you plan on having the equipment pad? For the setup I proposed, it may make a difference on how the lines are plumbed together and the line size. It may make more sense to have separate lines to each return depending on the equipment location. The stair returns can easily be plumbed together so that is not so much of an issue. But the other returns are spaced fairly far apart so it may not make too much sense in combining them. Or you can always combine them at some mid-way point. Using 5 x 1 ½†lines has about the same head loss as 3 x 2†lines so that is always an option. Of course, 5 x 2†lines have less head loss but it really doesn’t by you much in head loss reduction (about 3% to 5%). Most of the head loss will end being in the pad equipment and solar so it probably doesn’t matter all that much. Also, having the lines approximately the same length can help equalize flow although that can also be accomplished by ball valves at the pad.
Dad and I were discussing the size of return lines, 1 1/2" or 2". I thought I'd do 2" for returns but if you think 1 1/2" would be better, I could do that. Dad said I'd get more pressure from 1 1/2".
As to having a dedicated return for the solar, that presents a few problems. First, if you have all of the water going through the solar, then skimming and chlorination will stop, depending on how you chlorinate and how it is plumbed. If you split the return so that some of the water goes through solar and the rest through the other returns, then the pump speed will have to be higher to support the flow rates required for solar and skimming so you will sacrifice some of the energy efficiency of the pump.
There are some setups where it may make sense to have a separate solar return but given that you have an Intelliflo pump, it may not make sense in your case. Given you can optimized the speed of the pump, it may make more sense to send all of the water through the solar at 40-60 GPM and return all of the water through all of the returns. An equal 5-way split, would mean about 8-12 GPM per return (half for that for each step) which is not a lot but should be enough for adequate skimming.
So, are you saying it'd be better to run the solar through all the returns instaed of having one dedicated deep end return for the solar?
Also, I wanted to point out that no matter how you configure the skimmers and returns, skimming action decreases with a decrease in flow rates. So what most Intelliflo owners find is that there is a minimum flow rate at which the skimmers will work properly.
So, I will have to set the pump at an average <give or take> but still be able to feel it suck right? If I set it too low, I'll lose all skimming action but if I keep it up, but not high, It'll be able to still skim?
There are a lot of options you can make so I applaud your decision to put some effort and thought into the choices you are making. It will be worth it in the long run. Plumbing is usually an after thought for most pool builders (of course except for Waste and some others on TFP) and they usually do what is easiest/cheapest for them and not necessarily the best choice.
Again, I want to do it right. There is no sense in my mind to throw it all together and find out it doesn't do what I need it to do.
If I am unclear or whatever, set me straight!
I appreciate everything you guys are doing for me to get my pool!