- Jun 20, 2019
- 37
- Pool Size
- 30000
- Surface
- Plaster
- Chlorine
- Salt Water Generator
- SWG Type
- Pentair Intellichlor IC-60
We have a neighbor with a large eucalyptus tree that keeps me very busy raking leaves out of our large pool and have been using a 20” Red Baron net the last couple years, but with heavy use the netting is starting to rip and our pebble plaster has ground down part of the rim, so I was looking at other options before ordering the $29 rebuild kit for the Red Baron,
I saw on Amazon the ProTuff nets look similar and have a lifetime no-hassle replacement warranty with free replacement shipping, and they are offering a set of standard 19” or 23” rake net + 17” fine silt mesh net as a bundle. I was wanting to add a fine mesh net to our gear for when the eucalyptus is flowering to help me remove fine particles and silt so this seems like a good value and they seem to have good reviews on Amazon.
The ProTuff nets are pricey, similar cost to Red Baron, ($88 for 19” bundle & $91 for 23” bundle), but seems like saving $29 rebuild kit cost for the Red Baron every couple years would pay for itself fairly quickly, does anyone have any advice on Red Baron vs ProTuff?
(ProTuff sells just the 19” rake for $54, 23” rake for $57, + 17.5” silt net sold separately for $59, so the bundle seems like a good value, our poles are getting old so I’m also considering doing the 3 piece bundle with 23” rake, 17” silt net, and 16’ pole for $236, the 16’ pole is sold separately for $170, looks like a solid pole with superior adjustability and lifetime replacement warranty)
ProTuff has 19” or 23” rake net, so I was thinking to order the 23” version for more coverage width, but I’m curious if the additional size/weight of 23” vs 19” will make it more difficult to handle? Or if the extra width would make the work faster/easier? Does anyone have any preference using 19” vs 23” for rake nets?
…Or should I just stick with my old poles and rebuilding the 20” Red Baron rake?
I saw on Amazon the ProTuff nets look similar and have a lifetime no-hassle replacement warranty with free replacement shipping, and they are offering a set of standard 19” or 23” rake net + 17” fine silt mesh net as a bundle. I was wanting to add a fine mesh net to our gear for when the eucalyptus is flowering to help me remove fine particles and silt so this seems like a good value and they seem to have good reviews on Amazon.
The ProTuff nets are pricey, similar cost to Red Baron, ($88 for 19” bundle & $91 for 23” bundle), but seems like saving $29 rebuild kit cost for the Red Baron every couple years would pay for itself fairly quickly, does anyone have any advice on Red Baron vs ProTuff?
(ProTuff sells just the 19” rake for $54, 23” rake for $57, + 17.5” silt net sold separately for $59, so the bundle seems like a good value, our poles are getting old so I’m also considering doing the 3 piece bundle with 23” rake, 17” silt net, and 16’ pole for $236, the 16’ pole is sold separately for $170, looks like a solid pole with superior adjustability and lifetime replacement warranty)
ProTuff has 19” or 23” rake net, so I was thinking to order the 23” version for more coverage width, but I’m curious if the additional size/weight of 23” vs 19” will make it more difficult to handle? Or if the extra width would make the work faster/easier? Does anyone have any preference using 19” vs 23” for rake nets?
…Or should I just stick with my old poles and rebuilding the 20” Red Baron rake?