Which test kit is easier to read the results, Taylor K-2006 or TF-100?
Is there any way to be TFP Supporter with less than $100?Oh, and welcome to TFP!
![]()
Pool Care Basics Archives
Your one-stop shop for all things TFP to include: ABCs of Water Chemistry, Recommended Chemicals/Levels, Test Kits, Troubleshooting, and much more!www.troublefreepool.com
Good question. @Leebo can you answer that one?Is there any way to be TFP Supporter with less than $100?
Click the hamburger menu in the upper left corner and then ‘support TFP’. Scroll down for bronze / silver / gold. Keep scrolling to donate another amount of your choice. THANKS !!!Is there any way to be TFP Supporter with less than $100?
Ahhhhhh. Gotcha. I can’t tell any advantage. My TF-100 came with 2 different vial types and they are half dozen or six between them. One has black markings and the other is etched. This only matters for filling the vials with pool water.I was not asking which one was better because they both use the same reagents. I was talking about the scales, marks or printed levels in the tubes, etc. Again which one is more visible to read, etc?
ThanksClick the hamburger menu in the upper left corner and then ‘support TFP’. Scroll down for bronze / silver / gold. Keep scrolling to donate another amount of your choice. THANKS !!!
Ahhhhhh. Gotcha. I can’t tell any advantage. My TF-100 came with 2 different vial types and they are half dozen or six between them. One has black markings and the other is etched. This only matters for filling the vials with pool water.
The testing itself is identical and most of the tests are looking for bold color changes which are easy to spot. CYA and PH mess with all of us, also being identical between kits.
If you hadn’t planned on it already, the smart stir is hands down the best $30 you can spend on your pool.
The only issue I had is that the printed scale rubbed off on the TF test kit "chlorine only" tube. I switch to the Taylor Vial that has the levels molded into the side of the vial. This here. It also fits right on the speed stir.Thank you all.
I was not asking which one was better because they both use the same reagents. I was talking about the scales, marks or printed levels in the tubes, etc. Again which one is more visible to read, etc?