Ha.. I would agree. The NSF is a reputable organization. In fact most in not all municipal watersheds are testing our drinking water using equipment that is NSF certified. This is not science? Do you think they are using drop tests?
Not trying to argue for the sake of arguing. Maybe more of a healthy debate? these digital testing devices have gone through the same testing and certification process that the Taylor drop test kit has. In fact, the science behind it says they are certified to read CYA(and other parameters) to L1 which is higher than what Taylor provides.
What am I missing? Is it the pool store person administering the test? Is this the issue? Let’s assume they know what they are doing. If the NSF has certified the Lamotte for L1 accuracy and the Taylor drop test for L2 is that enough science?
The aquarium industry is a great example of a multi billion dollar industry embracing digital testing. Many reef keeping hobbyist have gone digital years ago. They are relying on digital test kits from Industrial systems and Lamotte to maintain parameters that require a smaller margin of error than pool parameters. Quite honestly, I was very surprised to hear the pool industry was still stuck on drop test. But then I realized it’s not the entire pool industry. It’s really just at TFP. Yes, drop tests work ok. I still use them. But so does consumer grade digital testing equipment There has to be a reason why TFP is stuck recommending drop tests??
getting ready for my beat down in 3..2..1..