I wouldn't rule out the possibility of trying for one of those "action reporters" to take up the cause, but I certainly also wouldn't hold my breath... I'm sure they get many submissions, and can only take a handful. I will look into it though.
Just a quick update on where we are now. We're waiting to hear a response from the builder... he has until Friday. We're currently operating under the assumption that he'll not respond favorably (or will simply ignore it). Maybe he'll surprise us, but in the meantime we've been using this time to consider what our next step will be.
Ironically, the factor that truly "liberated" us in all this was coming to terms with the harsh reality that this shell does need to be replaced. Patching it in place is not an option (it's apparent that more cracks will continue to form, and this will likely be a chronic condition, perhaps even worsening over time and resulting in a structural failure). Pulling it out of the ground, patching it, and resetting it would result in a cosmetically deficient pool, as the repairs would likely be more conspicuous than the cracks themselves. So, the result is that this takes the option of keeping this shell off the table. One way or another, it's coming out and being replaced, as we don't want the liability and future hassle of a poorly-installed pool in our backyard.
So, rather than "we'll sue, and if we win we'll replace the pool", our stance is now "we're going to replace the pool regardless, and sue". So yes, that means we have to pay for another pool installation, and subsequently hope that we win and are able to collect on the judgement.
We need to investigate pricing, but I'm guessing somewhere in the neighborhood of $30K. Our original contract price was about $34K (sans decking), and we already have the electrical work done and all of the equipment, which I'd roughly estimate as being worth about $3500 - $4000). We'd have a mostly-excavated hole to work with, saving some money, but the damaged shell would have to be removed and the hole would have to be adjusted, with more backfill material needed as well, so I'm assuming these two would cancel each other out.
Regardless, having to cough up another $30K is not appealing, but at this point we don't feel like we have any other choice... it needs to be done. However, we've just recently started considering another option.
Several weeks ago my wife mentioned, "you should install the replacement pool." I'm a pretty handy guy, as I've built several house additions, remodeled a kitchen, performed flood repairs (twice), done electrical and plumbing work, built a shed, gutted/rebuilt a fiberglass boat, etc. But I do know my limitations. For example, I won't install carpet... it's just something that I know I wouldn't be good at. And, I'd be apprehensive about taking on the project of installing a fiberglass pool. I know I could handle the plumbing and electrical work (low voltage LED lights), and could do the brick coping and tile as well, but the actual setting of the pool seems like it might be a bit more than I could handle on my own.
But I've stumbled onto the concept of the "assisted installation", and I think that could be exactly what we're looking for. If I could have someone help me get the new shell set and backfilled, my wife and I could handle everything else, and we'd save a lot of money in the process. Depending on the size/shape of the new shell, we may or may not need to bring in an excavator (we might be able to just manually adjust the shape of the hole with shovels, though I'm sure this would be a lot of work, especially clearing out all the old backfill and loose soil from the hole).
Of course, our labor shouldn't go uncompensated, so we'd still sue for appropriate damages (in other words, what it would have cost for a pool company to come in and do the work, minus the equipment from the original build that was salvaged). But it would reduce the amount of money we'd have to come up with, and would also enable me to be more hands-on (and not just an observer) to help ensure things were done right.
The only sticking point we'd need to figure out is what to do with this damaged shell, and that's something we'll have to discuss with the lawyer (again, assuming the builder does not comply with our demands). Our preference would be to drain it, cut it up with a sawzall, and have the pieces hauled away. But we need to make sure we can legally do this (or if it would hurt our case). So, the shell might need to be pulled up intact, and stored (either in our yard – yuck – or offsite somewhere) until the matter is completely resolved.
--Michael