That will make a significant difference. Look at the GPM and PSI measurements when you change that valve…report back if you want. I would expect the GPM numbers to be much lower and the PSI numbers to be higher (both at the filter and the IFCS head). It would be possible to slightly tweak that valve towards the pool return side, but it would need to be 85%+ towards the cleaning side to keep the IFCS working properly. If you do that, you may also have to increase the RPM during cleaning to keep the IFCS working properly.
With an IFCS, it would also be ideal to have an actual heater bypass valve that is manually/automatically controlled. Having the heater always “in the return loop” (even with the “automatic” bypass that you have currently), WILL reduce the PSI at the cleaning head and probably require a higher IFCS cleaning RPM than with an actual heater bypass valve.
Your IFCS system looks to be designed better than most, I would expect it to work well for a pool with 21400 gallons…close to the upper end of what I consider appropriate for a pool with an IFCS.