- Jul 5, 2017
- 319
- Pool Size
- 22000
- Surface
- Plaster
- SWG Type
- Pentair Intellichlor IC-40
Hi Guys would love some input from this fabulous community that helped me so much on my last pool build. Sorry in advance for the long post and thank you to those who read it. We are building a new house and getting quotes for a new pool (that I told myself I would never build again). Current pool is a gunite pool. I actually considered getting a fiberglass pool at the time but our HOA requires special approvals that can take forever so went with gunite. On the new pool I wanted to compare the two options because there are no limitations. I very naively thought fiberglass would be a less expensive option but turns out it is almost the exact same either way.
Below is a comparison. As you can see the "options" on fiberglass are way more and that is what seems to be driving the cost. I really was only considering fiberglass because I thought it would be less expensive and a quicker construction time. As far as construction time gunite is saying 6 months and fiberglass is much quicker but there is almost a 6 month lead time before starting so will end up being almost a wash. After doing research it seems like fiberglass does require less cost overtime with chemicals and refinishing (according to the people that sell fiberglas at least haha). The other caveat is we have terrible soil. The gunite builder is insisting we add piers which is around an additional $8k. Fiberglass builder said not a concern because fiberglass pools "flex" with soil movement. The gunite builder also included paver decking because of potential soil movement cracking poured concrete decking which is what is priced with fiberglass option. Size wise the gunite is 16'x38' and the fiberglass is 15.5'x40. I quoted this size with the gunite builder to get a close comparison but can save about $4k if we reduce size to 32'x16' which is similar to current pool. Oddly there is not a big cost difference reducing the size of the fiberglass pool but I can do the same size without a spa and save the cost on the heater so $5k less. Big difference is the fiberglass come with a built in spa. We live in Texas and honestly not sure how often we would use the spa. Our pool water turns to spa temps about mid summer so I am thinking this would be used sparingly spring and summer. I am also cheap when it comes to utility cost and we will be on propane so not sure how often we heat. I already know for the gunite option we will not add the heater but wanted it in for cost comparison. I do like the idea of a spa though. It would be cost prohibitive for our budget to add to gunite. The fiberglass also has a splash pad which we added to our current pool but never use so I am indifferent about that. There would be a lot more "swimmable" space in the gunite pool unless we get rid of the spa on the fiberglass. Lastly fiberglass has cantilevered coping vs. precast or flagstone coping included in gunite which aesthetically I like better.
I know both options have pros and cons. Would love to hear feedback especially if you have owned both types.
1-Does fiberglass really cost less for chemicals?
2-Anyone had issues with soil movement on fiberglass?
3- There seems to be a debate on waterline tile for fiberglass. Some say completely not needed others say you need it to prevent discoloration of gelcoat on waterline. Experience on this?
4- Those in warmer clients how often do you use your spa?
5- Since both options are relatively same cost which would you go with and why?
Attaching rendering from gunite PB and drawing of fiberglass option for visual comparison.


Below is a comparison. As you can see the "options" on fiberglass are way more and that is what seems to be driving the cost. I really was only considering fiberglass because I thought it would be less expensive and a quicker construction time. As far as construction time gunite is saying 6 months and fiberglass is much quicker but there is almost a 6 month lead time before starting so will end up being almost a wash. After doing research it seems like fiberglass does require less cost overtime with chemicals and refinishing (according to the people that sell fiberglas at least haha). The other caveat is we have terrible soil. The gunite builder is insisting we add piers which is around an additional $8k. Fiberglass builder said not a concern because fiberglass pools "flex" with soil movement. The gunite builder also included paver decking because of potential soil movement cracking poured concrete decking which is what is priced with fiberglass option. Size wise the gunite is 16'x38' and the fiberglass is 15.5'x40. I quoted this size with the gunite builder to get a close comparison but can save about $4k if we reduce size to 32'x16' which is similar to current pool. Oddly there is not a big cost difference reducing the size of the fiberglass pool but I can do the same size without a spa and save the cost on the heater so $5k less. Big difference is the fiberglass come with a built in spa. We live in Texas and honestly not sure how often we would use the spa. Our pool water turns to spa temps about mid summer so I am thinking this would be used sparingly spring and summer. I am also cheap when it comes to utility cost and we will be on propane so not sure how often we heat. I already know for the gunite option we will not add the heater but wanted it in for cost comparison. I do like the idea of a spa though. It would be cost prohibitive for our budget to add to gunite. The fiberglass also has a splash pad which we added to our current pool but never use so I am indifferent about that. There would be a lot more "swimmable" space in the gunite pool unless we get rid of the spa on the fiberglass. Lastly fiberglass has cantilevered coping vs. precast or flagstone coping included in gunite which aesthetically I like better.
I know both options have pros and cons. Would love to hear feedback especially if you have owned both types.
1-Does fiberglass really cost less for chemicals?
2-Anyone had issues with soil movement on fiberglass?
3- There seems to be a debate on waterline tile for fiberglass. Some say completely not needed others say you need it to prevent discoloration of gelcoat on waterline. Experience on this?
4- Those in warmer clients how often do you use your spa?
5- Since both options are relatively same cost which would you go with and why?
Attaching rendering from gunite PB and drawing of fiberglass option for visual comparison.


Description | Gunite | Notes | Fiberglass | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Base Price | $72,341 | $8k of this is piers not included in Fiberglass. Also includes pebble plaster. | $63,680 | Fiberglass has built in spa |
Heater | $2,900 | 400k BTU Propane | $5,088 | 250k BTU Propane |
Automation Upgrade | $780 | $3,788 | ||
SWG | $900 | Getting credit removing Ozone/UV included | $2,061 | |
Robot Cleaner | -$95 | Small credit because pressure side cleaner included | $0 | Did not quote any automated cleaner |
Waterline Tile | $0 | Mandatory included in base price | $6,495 | Upgrade and not mandatory |
Total | $76,826 | $81,112 | ||
Total with options likely to go with | $73,926 | No heater | $70,829 | No waterline tile or automation |