Experts: TA levels--SWGs

gregsfc

0
Bronze Supporter
May 27, 2014
202
Cookeville,TN
I'm a manual doser of LC, aka bleach, but I'm interested in how the experts recommend helping SWG operators keep pH as steady as possible, because I keep reading in the forums about a pH drift problem for those who use SWGs; and how, at least the sense I'm getting, this is something they have to deal with as part of pool water management with a saltwater pool. I've already read the following link:



I know that for me, manually adding bleach daily, I have zero pH drift issues, but there was an adjustment that I had to make going from the traditional method that prescribes trichlor as the daily chlorine form to sodium hypochlorite, since my pool was no longer being continually dosed with acid. Once I made that adjustment, however, I now average only one pH adjustment per year, which is one of the reasons I plan on staying with the manual chlorine dosing system of pool care. The adjustment I made back then when I first started dosing with bleach was to use the required, continual MA dosing that was needed to keep pH in range. After a few weeks of this dosing, this process lowered TA over time. The drift then stopped. Back then I came on the forum and asked if there was anything I could do, because I was in an endless cycle of pH adjustments, followed by resetting the TA back in range. I had been raising TA back up to mid range about once every two-to-three weeks, because, back then, it wasn't a regular prescription to lower TA and there were no articles about using TA to help with pH drift, and the recommended TA level back then was more like 70-100; instead of the current "50-90 sometimes higher recommendation". The average pool owner who is not chemistry minded would have not known it was allowed back then to lower TA below the recommended 70 and didn't understand the relationship between the two levels. Chem Geek came on my post inquiry and asked me for some numbers. He calculated my CSI and then came back again and gave me a minimum TA level for my pool to avoid a pH crash that would risk equipment damage. He also told me to avoid acidic products in my pool except for stabilizer. So back then I just kept dosing with MA to stay in pH range, and when the pH quit drifting, my TA ended up being 60, which was far above that lowest limit that Chem Geek had given me. Seems like this took just two or three weeks. Seems like my low limit was in the thirties. Everything has been trouble free ever since. I mostly just add stabilizer about twice per year and bleach every day. Bleach costs me $2.99 for a full gallon at 10% strength, so I'm spending under $100 per year on sanitizer plus about 3 lbs of stabilzier per year, reagents, and replacing worn out equipment like covers and brushes, and that's it.

So I guess part of what I want to understand is just "how low" can SWG operators go to manipulate the TA level to help with pH drift for each pool surface type? Do they have to stay 50 or above for every pool surface, or is there a lower TA level they can go to if necessary, and if they are able to go to a lower number, what is that number and what are the concerns of a TA level that is deemed too low for surfaces where we are not concerned so much about the saturation index? And also, related to this question, it would seem to me that if that most SWG operators continually add MA to keep pH in range, then they'd also deal with continual BS dosing to keep TA up to whatever that minimum level might be. The two other things I know of to help steady pH in a drift situation is to minimize aeration and to add borates. Please experts please expound on any of this and make any corrections to incorrect assumptions that I may have made. I'm here to learn. This site is becoming more and more SWG dominated, and I want to understand the chemistry and management recommendations better.
 
If your pH is steady using LC, it will be with a SWCG. Just adjust your chemistry in the same way.

We warn that a TA at or below 50 'can' create a condition of pH crashing. One must be aware of that.

pH rise is primarily caused by the addition of higher TA fill water. Or massive aeration.
 
You may be making this out to be a bit more complicated than it needs to be, but I think I can help with some basic notes:
1 - As a non-salt pool, you seem to have found the perfect sweet spot balance for TA and pH. That's great and what we hope to see everyone achieve.
2 - Salt pools differ in-part because of the aeration continuously generated which can increase the pH.
3 - Because of that aeration, some salt pools do better with the pH settling in the upper 7s. To help with that balance, a slightly lower TA is allowed.
4 - Sometimes a TA/Ph balance of 50-60 to 7.7-7.8 works good and remains steady in salt pools. For some, a little acid is till required every week or so. Sure the TA "might" try to fall too low in which case a little BS would be required. Just part of monitoring everything.

That's about it really. Hope that helps.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gregsfc
This is interesting to me as well. Many people here will tell you the net effect of chlorination is largely pH neutral. While this is probably true, the act of the SWCG MAKING the chlorine raises pH. Then when the chlorine is reduced, the pH goes back down.

I use intellichem to control pH, so my system sees the increased pH during chlorine generation and doses MA to keep it at my set point, before the generated chlorine gets reduced, at least I think. So there are around twice daily small MA injections. This lowers TA. My TA eventually settles at 40-50, just below the lower recommendation. If I add baking soda to raise it, it will just eventually get reduced back to 40-50. My make up water TA is 120, pH anywhere between 7.8-8.2 on any given day.

So I'm leaving my TA at 40-50 for now. Pool is down to using about 1/2 gallon of 14.5% MA per week this way. pH is 7.3 +/-.06 on a daily basis. CYA is 30. My CH is 800 and water temp is 87+ right now so the low TA really helps with CSI. When the water gets cold, I'll raise pH, lower chlorine generation and maybe TA will rise from the makeup water. If not I'll have to add baking soda.

The only other acidic added is an occasional trichlor puck to add a bit of stabilizer.

I figure as long as my pH is stable I'll let the TA ride low.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gregsfc
I installed acid injection automation to cover this issue. But I can confirm the more you try to force the pH down, to maybe align with some sort of pH guideline, the worse the balance gets. I crashed my TA (and CSI) by doing that this summer. When I let the pH rise back up to the high 7s, TA was restored and the amount of acid required dropped dramatically. I monitor CSI closely, but had to "loosen the strings" a bit to solve for the pH/TA merry-go-round I was on.
 
Thanks everyone. So the sense that I've gotten reading forum posts about always having to continually add MA to keep pH in range with SWCG systems being more so than with manually dosed systems is not correct. It is more likely then that either: users have not found their sweet spots through experience and experimentation regarding TA/pH balance that is no different than for manual chlorinators; or, they have excessive aeration via running their SWCG often or other factors that cause extra aeration; or they have high TA in their fill water sources, which could also be true for manual dosers?

It's Interesting also where I see some users flirting with TA 40 number or even lower, and wonder why lower TA numbers aren't recommended or tried more often beyond concerns of csi for some pool types to help owners find their way towards a less troublesome pool. It seems like I'm picking up that this 50 level is just a precaution to prevent a pH crash that could more easily occur at lower TA levels if someone suddenly decided to start adding an acidic chemical or acid rain or something of that nature, but there is little in pool water chemistry that says this super-low buffer level by itself is problematic. This topic has always intrigued me going back to when it solved my drift problem in 2014 and made my pool care trouble free.

If one goes outside this group just to see what's being said and taught out of general interest, there is lots of honest misinformation about using liquid chlorine. What I mean by honest is that people really believe these things and that they are not intentionally misleading or trying to fool us for profit. One: that FC levels are used up faster when sodium hypochlorite is used rather than trichlor and should therefore be dosed only at night and usually only for superchlorination in order to save on money and product; two: that LC dosing always raises pH and acid must be dosed along with bleach every time to maintain pH in range. These two notions are at Leslie's website as just one example. I have theories as to why the excessive fc consumption myth exists, but I'll focus this post on the pH rising myth. I believe that the upward pressure on pH notion comes from two factors: that they are testing pH soon after LC is added; before the hypochlorous acid is formed, which creates the pH balancing that occurs and so those pools have the immediate upward effect of the pH 13 of LC; and also, these traditional set up pools have created a TA/pH balance more suited for the continual downward pressure from using trichlor; and so switching to or ocassionally using bleach will increase pH if it is replacing trichlor in a pool at those higher TA levels.

Basically, I think it is a lack of understanding of water chemistry and developing techniques and myths based on experience/results rather than understanding what is really going on chemistry wise with respect to both the effect on pH myth of sodium hypichlorite and also the excessive fc consumption myth. I imagine that there is also misinformation about how SWCG affects chemistry as well outside this group. It is interesting also that if a member here gets in a debate with someone outside this group who teaches or believes something false, they never have a chemistry-based rebuttal. If they do decide to debate one of us, it will either be: "I've had a pool for twenty years and my way works" or "I've got 30 years experience in the pool care industry". They've always got exactly 30 years of teaching misinformation except for Lowry who has 40years.
 
Also often overlooked or misrepresented (and you might have been saying this): switching from CYA-based pucks to liquid chlorine (or an SWG) can result in a pH swing, but it's not the chlorine. When you stop using the pucks, you stop adding CYA (A = acid) and so the pH rise can be nothing more than that. Your pool had an "acid appetite" all along, and the pucks were feeding it.
 
Also often overlooked or misrepresented (and you might have been saying this): switching from CYA-based pucks to liquid chlorine (or an SWG) can result in a pH swing, but it's not the chlorine. When you stop using the pucks, you stop adding CYA (A = acid) and so the pH rise can be nothing more than that. Your pool had an "acid appetite" all along, and the pucks were feeding it.
So much also depends on your makeup water. I've only known water that is alkaline and minerally in area of high temp and high evap rates. I can only imagine the water in non-desert areas could result in very different swings and balance when chemical addition changes are made. At least with high TA makeup water there is some upward pressure on TA.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dirk
That's why we test! Here's another gremlin: you could get everything worked out, then it slips away from you for no apparent reason! My municipality has to swap between well water and lake water to supply water all year round. I expect other times they mix the two as well. The two sources have different CH and TA levels. Just another possible variable that can cause a ph/TA mystery. Testing fill water periodically is a good habit, especially if there are TA and CH issues.

The Pool Math app accommodates tracking multiple pools. I have two pools set up in Pool Math. One is my pool, the other is the fill water (labeled as such). It's an easy way for me to keep track of my fill water, and observe how its levels trend. Actually, I have three pools. The third is my fill water after my water softener (which I use to control CH rise). I monitor the city water, my "treated" water, and my pool water, to watch how all three are playing off each other. I suppose it will also tell me when my water softener needs replacing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: scottts
Great read, especially for me ... as I plan to add salt and turn on my SWCG this coming weekend.

I know the aeration in the cell is often cited as the source of the pH rise ... but wouldn't the Sodium Hydroxide have more of an impact on the pH?

[ 2 Salt (2NaCl) + 2 Water (2H2O) ] + Electricity ..... results in ..... [ 2 Sodium Hydroxide (2NaOH) + Chlorine (Cl2) + Hydrogen Gas (H2) ]

1600706685343.png

I suppose it doesn't really matter if it's aeration or the NaOH causing the rise .... I'm just curious :)
 

Enjoying this content?

Support TFP with a donation.

Give Support
I suppose it doesn't really matter...
Ya beat me to it. ;)

I could swear I saw pH rise when I first started using my SWG. So I've already been on this ride, seeking the great unknown. It came down to pouring some acid vs pouring a lot of chlorine. I do neither now (with the IntellipH). It was all academic. There's just no way I'd have a pool without an SWG, so I do what I gotta do, reasons and science be darned.
 
Last edited:
Great read, especially for me ... as I plan to add salt and turn on my SWCG this coming weekend.

I know the aeration in the cell is often cited as the source of the pH rise ... but wouldn't the Sodium Hydroxide have more of an impact on the pH?

[ 2 Salt (2NaCl) + 2 Water (2H2O) ] + Electricity ..... results in ..... [ 2 Sodium Hydroxide (2NaOH) + Chlorine (Cl2) + Hydrogen Gas (H2) ]

View attachment 163356

I suppose it doesn't really matter if it's aeration or the NaOH causing the rise .... I'm just curious :)

You have to look at the net reaction that occurs because the chlorine gas almost instantly dissolves into the water. When you account for chlorine gas dissolving (creating hypochlorous acid and chloride ion), you get the following overall net reaction -

2H2O + Cl- --> HOCl + OH- + H2(g)

So the process is somewhat basic but not by a lot because the HOCl partially offsets the pH rise from the hydroxyl ion (OH-).

If you look at commercial grade bleaches (12% and higher), the sodium hydroxide concentration (excess lye added for stability) is anywhere form 0.1 to 0.4 wt%. Even if you use the highest NaOH concentrations, the concentration change of adding 1 gallon of bleach to 10,000 gallons of pool water would be around 5uM (micro-moles or 10-6M). So the pH change from liquid chlorine additions is minuscule. Any pH increase from the conversion of sodium hypochlorite to hypochlorous acid will be offset by oxidation and sanitation reactions. Bleaches are, for all intents and practical purposes, pH neutral in daily chlorination situations. When using bleaches to achieve shock levels, one must add significantly more and so the pH can rise a bit. This is why the SLAM process always instructs the user to reduce pH first to avoid any issues.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gregsfc
You have to look at the net reaction that occurs because the chlorine gas almost instantly dissolves into the water. When you account for chlorine gas dissolving (creating hypochlorous acid and chloride ion), you get the following overall net reaction -

2H2O + Cl- --> HOCl + OH- + H2(g)

So the process is somewhat basic but not by a lot because the HOCl partially offsets the pH rise from the hydroxyl ion (OH-).

If you look at commercial grade bleaches (12% and higher), the sodium hydroxide concentration (excess lye added for stability) is anywhere form 0.1 to 0.4 wt%. Even if you use the highest NaOH concentrations, the concentration change of adding 1 gallon of bleach to 10,000 gallons of pool water would be around 5uM (micro-moles or 10-6M). So the pH change from liquid chlorine additions is minuscule. Any pH increase from the conversion of sodium hypochlorite to hypochlorous acid will be offset by oxidation and sanitation reactions. Bleaches are, for all intents and practical purposes, pH neutral in daily chlorination situations. When using bleaches to achieve shock levels, one must add significantly more and so the pH can rise a bit. This is why the SLAM process always instructs the user to reduce pH first to avoid any issues.
Thanks ... Makes sense for liquid chlorine ... but what happens to the Sodium Hydroxide which results from the electrolysis process of a SWCG? It appears th electrolysis process creates 2x the amount of NaOH as it does chlorine ... or is this just so far over my head that I'm missing something?

2NaCl + 2H2O + Electricity ..... results in ..... 2NaOH + Cl2 + H2
Then ....
2H2O + Cl ..... results in ..... HOCl + OH- + H2(g)

What happens to the 2NaOH produced in the 1st (electrolysis) reaction?
 
You have to look at the net reaction that occurs because the chlorine gas almost instantly dissolves into the water. When you account for chlorine gas dissolving (creating hypochlorous acid and chloride ion), you get the following overall net reaction -

2H2O + Cl- --> HOCl + OH- + H2(g)

So the process is somewhat basic but not by a lot because the HOCl partially offsets the pH rise from the hydroxyl ion (OH-).

If you look at commercial grade bleaches (12% and higher), the sodium hydroxide concentration (excess lye added for stability) is anywhere form 0.1 to 0.4 wt%. Even if you use the highest NaOH concentrations, the concentration change of adding 1 gallon of bleach to 10,000 gallons of pool water would be around 5uM (micro-moles or 10-6M). So the pH change from liquid chlorine additions is minuscule. Any pH increase from the conversion of sodium hypochlorite to hypochlorous acid will be offset by oxidation and sanitation reactions. Bleaches are, for all intents and practical purposes, pH neutral in daily chlorination situations. When using bleaches to achieve shock levels, one must add significantly more and so the pH can rise a bit. This is why the SLAM process always instructs the user to reduce pH first to avoid any issues.
So if adding a daily dose of bleach in a swimming pool causes only a minuscule increase in the pH level, is it correct to assume then that high pH test results that come after dosing with bleach (we'll say 2 hours after) is due to the inaccuracy of a pH test result, because of high FC levels more than it being due to an actual high pH level?
 
Thanks ... Makes sense for liquid chlorine ... but what happens to the Sodium Hydroxide which results from the electrolysis process of a SWCG? It appears th electrolysis process creates 2x the amount of NaOH as it does chlorine ... or is this just so far over my head that I'm missing something?

2NaCl + 2H2O + Electricity ..... results in ..... 2NaOH + Cl2 + H2
Then ....
2H2O + Cl ..... results in ..... HOCl + OH- + H2(g)

What happens to the 2NaOH produced in the 1st (electrolysis) reaction?

The reaction I posted above is the NET reaction you get when you create chlorine gas by electrolysis (your first reaction) and then combine that with chlorine gas dissolving in water as well as water dissociating into hydrogen and hydroxide. It's three reactions that have to be added together as they are all occurring. Please read Post #3 in this thread for the details of chlorine chemistry that Richard (@chem geek) spent a lot of time writing up -

 
  • Like
Reactions: gregsfc
So if adding a daily dose of bleach in a swimming pool causes only a minuscule increase in the pH level, is it correct to assume then that high pH test results that come after dosing with bleach (we'll say 2 hours after) is due to the inaccuracy of a pH test result, because of high FC levels more than it being due to an actual high pH level?

When hypochlorite dissolves in water, it creates hypochlorous acid and hydroxide anions. If you measure the pH right after adding chlorine (assuming you have good circulation and homogenization), then you will see that hydroxide concentration increase show up as an increase in pH. Over time, that hydroxide increase is reduced (and pH decreases again) by oxidation and sanitation reactions which are generally acidic in character.

Please read (or re-read) Richard's thread regarding chlorine chemistry -

 
  • Like
Reactions: gregsfc
The reaction I posted above is the NET reaction you get when you create chlorine gas by electrolysis (your first reaction) and then combine that with chlorine gas dissolving in water as well as water dissociating into hydrogen and hydroxide. It's three reactions that have to be added together as they are all occurring. Please read Post #3 in this thread for the details of chlorine chemistry that Richard (@chem geek) spent a lot of time writing up -


Thanks. I checked it out, but the only place I saw Richard mention NaOH was in reference to a small amount added to liquid chlorine as a preservative. He didn't make mention of it being created within the electrolysis process.

I searched the whole thread for "Hydroxide" and didn't find it in any other replies either.


Here is where he mentioned it, and the context ....

Adding Chlorine
NaOCl + H2O --> Na+ + HOCl + OH- (+ extra base Na+ + OH-)
HOCl --> H+ + OCl-
Sodium Hypochlorite (liquid chlorine or bleach) combines with water to produce sodium ions (part of regular table salt) plus disinfecting chlorine plus hydroxyl ion. The hydroxyl ion makes this a basic reaction that raises pH, but because the disinfecting chlorine is a weak acid this overall reaction raises the pH by less than a strong base would. Note that there is a small amount of extra base in the form of Sodium Hydroxide (lye or caustic soda) that comes with Sodium Hypochlorite and is there to help preserve it, but this amount is rather small.

Maybe my ignorance in chemistry is starting to show here, but it seems like the electrolysis process creates two NaOH for every Cl2 ... so using a SWCG would result in much more Sodium Hydroxide than the small amount added to liquid chlorine as a preservative.

Or am I just way off here? Considering it really doesn't matter, and is just a curiosity on my part ... no problem telling me it's over my head, and I'll go away :p
 

Enjoying this content?

Support TFP with a donation.

Give Support
Thread Status
Hello , This thread has been inactive for over 60 days. New postings here are unlikely to be seen or responded to by other members. For better visibility, consider Starting A New Thread.