- Oct 25, 2015
- 5,829
- Pool Size
- 28000
- Surface
- Plaster
- Chlorine
- Salt Water Generator
- SWG Type
- CircuPool RJ-60 Plus
Sorry for the delay Matt. Been slammed with a number of time-consuming diversions. Great question though. I did indeed look into a performance bond. I found it to be a waste of money for the construction contracts I was entering into. Most of the ones I found were basically guaranteeing the work was performed in a manner that ensured compliance with the building code. I was doing that through my own management of the job and the county did a lot of this as well through their inspection process. Construction contractors that also do public works construction over a certain limit ($100,000 I believe) are required to provide a bond. Very few construction contractors I dealt with for the house and currently for the pool have ever been bonded. Not saying they can't get it just that they are not usually required to do so. Typically performance bond limits are set at about half the contract value. Then I looked into the claims process. Wow! If there's a real serious issue I could spend years filing a claim with the convoluted process I could find. Maybe this is different in other states but I found doing my own due diligence on contractors and negotiating terms that were fair was my best protection. Very few of my subcontractors started with fair contracts to the owner but it was very easy to make them fair. My shell contract was the largest one for the house. Their scope included slab, block, roof framing and sheathing. My excavation, electrical, plumbing, roofing, and hvac subs all had to interface with them. So it just seemed to me that I could spend a LOT of $ on bonds for each of them and nobody would take consequential damages which meant I'd probably be left with a complicated claim to prosecute that would very likely yield nothing but an added insurance cost. So my best protection was to perform due diligence on financials of the contractors as well as verify their capability to perform, and verify they were doing so at critical steps. I required each one to show me work in progress to be able to submit a bid. I can tell a good contractor because I've been in this business for 40 years. Anybody can do the same thing by hiring an experienced constructor to do this for them. Retirees are a great source for this. Also, my construction commercial terms were built to ensure I never got much ahead of work in place. For some reason a lot of owners expect they will have to give builders a boatload of cash at signing with no control of how it's spent. Neither are true for quality contractors and they certainly shouldn't apply to builders.@setsailsoon - when you built your home, did you use surety/performance bonds? What about the pool?
I'm very much aware of the horror stories in Florida around pool builders over last couple years. When a market gets like it is for pools in Florida especially post covid margins go so high you attract a lot of scum. They prey on the people that don't have a clue how to hire a pool builder. Most of these cases started with an owner paying the "pool builder" $50,000 or more before the job even started or after the contractor "mobilized". Then then never saw him again. You can find a lot of threads even on this site where owners had absurd contracts they should never have signed that end up with almost as bad results. When potential pool owners come here to get advice I often suggest they look at their contracts and commercial aspects and Allen sends them to the Wiki notes we have on this. Sadly, many (most) don't pay much attention to this part. You hit the nail on the head "caveat emptor". Problem is very few know how to deal with this. And most also don't seem to want to.
Sorry for the rambling response but my simple answer to your question is that a performance bond just wasn't worth the cost for me and I concluded I was way better off with paying the cost of best practices for project management from start to finish.
I hope this helps.
Chris