Coping to deck transition without elastomeric sealant?

jml74

New member
Aug 16, 2023
3
Atlanta, GA
I'm not actually a pool owner, but I'm a home inspector and do pool inspections following the ASHI standards of practice. I'm doing one right now where is a dispute between the homeowner and contractor about a lot of renovation work being done, and I noticed that the in-ground pool (still under construction) has stone coping and decking butted together with no elastomeric sealant at the transition. As far as I know this is not OK, but can somebody enlighten me if there are scenarios where it's acceptable? I don't have pictures at the moment, but can provide some if necessary.
 
As far as I know this is not OK, but can somebody enlighten me if there are scenarios where it's acceptable?

Welcome to TFP.

See Expansion Joints and Coping - Further Reading for some diagrams.

And see this from an engineering company...


The pool structure and the deck should always be able to move independently so as not to put pressure on each each other and cause cracking.

Where the debate comes is when pavers are placed on sand or the ground, and not on concrete. The argument is that the pavers have spacing between them and cannot put much pressure on the pool structure.

Then you get into "it depends" on how tight the pavers are laid and if they are interlocking and if the pavers can effectively put pressure like a solid structure on the pool. And you find that over time the spacing between pavers can get filled and they are more interlocked.

I recommend that an expansion joint always be installed even with pavers. It is cheap insurance to ensure that problems do not occur a few years down the road. This can be especially important if there are columns holding up something like a pergola near the pool that can cause ground movement. We have seen cracked pools with pavers without an expansion joint where you would say it should not happen but it does.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jml74 and Bperry
Thank you very much for the pointers, and I'm glad to hear I wasn't totally off base. I haven't read over that expansion joint section yet, but I definitely will. Here are a couple of pictures; they're larger than what I would consider pavers, and it's a very tight joint.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_8422.jpeg
    IMG_8422.jpeg
    460.6 KB · Views: 23
  • IMG_8424.jpeg
    IMG_8424.jpeg
    262.5 KB · Views: 23
  • IMG_8421.jpeg
    IMG_8421.jpeg
    606.1 KB · Views: 23




1692237574005.png

 
  • Like
Reactions: jml74
I would want a proper expansion joint especially if the other side of the deck also was against a mortared edge or wall.

Even if the stones are not mortared in, they will still expand and contract and if they are tightly packed and constrained on both sides, there will be excessive pressure and force as the stones expand due to the heat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jml74
Thread Status
Hello , This thread has been inactive for over 60 days. New postings here are unlikely to be seen or responded to by other members. For better visibility, consider Starting A New Thread.