I tend to agree with
@Jimrahbe on this one - I would never recommend an IFC to anyone building a pool but, if a pool has an IFC, then it's not a deal breaker. As Jim stated, IFC's way over-complicate the pool plumbing and, if a pool is built without wall returns and relies solely on IFC's, then that is just a very poor design.
Like you, I live in AZ and IFC's are very popular because pool builders like to push the notion that the desert is dusty and IFC's are the perfect way to clean a dusty pool. They also like to point out that you get better heat and chemical distribution using an IFC. I disagree with those points but many people believe in them so I try not to argue about it. The one HUGE down side to IFC's is that a pool built with them has a lot of PVC running inside the gunite shell. Structural concrete "best practices" calls for as little penetration and foreign object embedment as possible in a load-bearing concrete structure. PVC pipe buried inside the gunite shell is
impossible to repair if something goes wrong and the volume it takes up can lead to structural weak points and voids if the shotcrete crew is not careful. It is not at all unusual to find pools with IFC's that are abandoned (typically sealed off with hydraulic cement) because they began to leak. Finally cost is a big issue - IFC's can add several thousand dollars to the cost of a pool build as compared to a modern robot cleaner which cost a lot less ($600-$1200). My robot runs every few days and keeps the pool exceptionally clean.
I don't plan on ever building a pool again and this will likely be the last pool I ever own, but should the fates curse me with another job in recreational water management, an IFC would definitely not be on my "must have" list ...