Michael z
In The Industry
In fact, the brand I'm referring to is my own brand, haha.Do you mind sharing what brand this is or posting a link?
ETA: I'm seeing one made by Chasing called the Poolmate Hydro 3 and 3S that may fit this criteria but have not heard anything about them.
I have used many brands of products for research.
And come to the forum to listen to user suggestions.
But due to platform rules, I should not directly send the link to my product, and it has not been officially launched for sale yet.
However, in terms of hardware parameters, the poolmate hydro you mentioned is a good choice.
At least in terms of hardware specifications, they are much better than wybots
They claim to use a 150W motor and a 200+Wh battery, while wybot only uses a 65W motor and a 99Wh battery
Wybot is better at meeting the lowest level of full utilization at the lowest price: 65
W's small motor can climb walls, and no one can do better than them in using the lowest power motor.
Then achieve sales success by offering the cheapest prices on Amazon.
You can understand it as the impact of affordable and fuel-efficient Japanese cars on traditional high displacement cars in the United States.
But its disadvantage is that if your wall is slippery or the pool is dirty, it will not be able to climb up the wall successfully after the filter is clogged, and when in floor mode, it will “wheelie”
But Wybot is the inventor of cordless swimming pool robots, with 20 years of industry experience and a mature, stable, and reasonably priced supply chain.
Therefore, they are relatively mature and reliable.
They recently launched wybot c2 and added a fine filter on top of c1.
But the hardware parameters remain at 65w+99wh for the weak battery, which makes me wonder if the weak suction can support it to climb up the wall after the filter gets dirty, or if it can firmly suck on the floor when cleaning the swimming pool floor, preventing it from "Wheelie"
The parameters of Poolmate are high, but obviously they don't have enough experience yet.
As time slowly passes.
There are also some negative feedback pointing out potential quality hazards (such as charging issues that cannot be avoided in the swimming pool robot industry), but this situation exists for every brand including Aiper and Wybot, albeit in different proportions.
Perhaps it can be evaluated by the proportion of long-term negative comments.
But it can be seen that poolmate only lacks experience with the first product, but as a new brand, they are making every effort to make the product better.
I think it's worth trying as a new brand