For practical purposes I use (and love) the testing supplies in my TF-100 kit. They are certainly accurate enough for general pool-maintenance.
BUT, this question is more of a technical curiosity nature. How would a lab or scientist test the CYA of water if they needed to figure it out to a much higher degree of accuracy.
Why? Well, I'm a tinkerer and was pondering ways to automate the CYA test using a light source, photo-resistive sensor, etc. but realized i would need a better base-line than my own tests if the goal was to improve accuracy as well as automate. I've read of pre-formulated "standard solutions" so that may be my best bet for testing. But, that still left my curious mind asking, "How do they know its 50ppl (or 50%, or whatever...)?"
BUT, this question is more of a technical curiosity nature. How would a lab or scientist test the CYA of water if they needed to figure it out to a much higher degree of accuracy.
Why? Well, I'm a tinkerer and was pondering ways to automate the CYA test using a light source, photo-resistive sensor, etc. but realized i would need a better base-line than my own tests if the goal was to improve accuracy as well as automate. I've read of pre-formulated "standard solutions" so that may be my best bet for testing. But, that still left my curious mind asking, "How do they know its 50ppl (or 50%, or whatever...)?"