So our pool build had shotcrete on Monday. Now I'm trying to get a fuller understanding of what the shotcrete/gunite provides versus what the plaster provides and adds.
The overall shape and layout of the pool from the shotcrete is darn near perfection when you stand back and look at it as a whole. However, when I look closer (as I'm watering it twice a day) I see a LOT of imperfections. And I don't fully understand if those are expected and things that get fixed with plaster.
Things like there is a ton of what I would call shotcrete debris or shotcrete rocks/gravel all over the place. Or small dips/crevices in a surface that in the end should be smooth and flat. Or an edge/corner that seems rougher than I'd want in the end. Are these things that the plaster can make up for?
I'm assuming so since the builder didn't express any concerns, but am curious to hear what people here have experienced in terms of how much difference there is between the pool at the shotcrete/gunite shell stage and the final post-plaster stage.
The overall shape and layout of the pool from the shotcrete is darn near perfection when you stand back and look at it as a whole. However, when I look closer (as I'm watering it twice a day) I see a LOT of imperfections. And I don't fully understand if those are expected and things that get fixed with plaster.
Things like there is a ton of what I would call shotcrete debris or shotcrete rocks/gravel all over the place. Or small dips/crevices in a surface that in the end should be smooth and flat. Or an edge/corner that seems rougher than I'd want in the end. Are these things that the plaster can make up for?
I'm assuming so since the builder didn't express any concerns, but am curious to hear what people here have experienced in terms of how much difference there is between the pool at the shotcrete/gunite shell stage and the final post-plaster stage.
Last edited: