Moved from HERE
Given that logic I would have thought that the safe-to-swim level would be higher than SLAM.
P.S thank you for all the awesome info and help on TFP, I'm so thankful I found it!
Sorry to revive an old thread, but what makes it unsafe to swim in a pool with FC higher than SLAM if SLAM is only 1/5 of the active chlorine level of the "perfectly safe 3ppm FC & 0 CYA from CDC"?As we are approaching this from an industry standpoint, perhaps an article in an industry publication would be a good place to start:
Aqua Magazine: CYA and Chlorine in Plain Language
IMO, the most important quote from that article is
Which means that 20 ppm CYA and 1 ppm FC is virtually the same as 200 ppm CYA and 10 ppm FC. With 3 ppm FC and zero CYA (perfectly safe and ideal according to the CDC) a body of water with pH of 7.5 at 80 degrees F would have an HOCl of 1.451. A pool with 2.5:1 CYA:FC concentration (SLAM Level) would have roughly 0.3 ppm HOCl. So a pool at SLAM level has only 1/5th the active chlorine (HOCl) as a pool that is within CDC guidance for safe and ideal. More chlorine can be less harsh, one of the most difficult things for anybody new to TFP to buy in to until it is experienced.
I will allow the rest of the article to speak for itself. Please keep in mind that the article, while following the same science TFP has been promoting for well over 10 years, was not written by anybody at TFP and may differ in some of the conclusions.
Given that logic I would have thought that the safe-to-swim level would be higher than SLAM.
P.S thank you for all the awesome info and help on TFP, I'm so thankful I found it!
Last edited by a moderator: