I've read through the post and it is called Shock Level and Maintain but what I read just looks like the standard Chlorine shock procedure. Where's the Level and Maintain part?
I've read through the post and it is called Shock Level and Maintain but what I read just looks like the standard Chlorine shock procedure. Where's the Level and Maintain part?
In 1970 that wasn't available. We did shock every spring but not because there was an issue to tackle but rather to prevent one from happening. Pools should never get to the point of needing a SLAM or a shock for that matter. We knew people that had to shock their pool because the HAD to do it and when they did it they added heavy doses of Chlorine for a week or so, keeping it out of range for even reading on an OTO the whole time and sweeping an vacuuming. It is that we just called this "shocking the pool", not doing a SLAM. It is the same thing but the name has been changed.
- - - Updated - - -
I guess I'm trying to say is that nobody ever got sick or died from having higher levels of chlorine in the pool. OTOH, they did when it was too low.
I could be wrong. I have been before.
- Exactly. But most folks subjected to poolstore voodoo don't know thisThere is no miracle "shock treatment".
Felipe!
Sammy, the theoretical process isn't new, but the details/criteria for execution are more dialed in
1. FC:CYA ratio is critical, and without knowing it, one is winking in the dark (you may think you know what you're doing bu the algae doesn't). This ratio is the science behind TFP, and the former lack of adopting this science is what caused frequent failure of "shocking" per pool store advice.
Example: "shocking" at 10 with CYA at 100 is most definitely winking in the dark
2. Testing criteria and calculations are specific and performed with FAS-DPD so that the parameters for success can be predictable.
- Exactly. But most folks subjected to poolstore voodoo don't know thisGood on you that you did
![]()