I am installing a sheer descent style water feature that needs 140 GPM to clear the deck into our pool. I thought I had done all my homework regarding total head calculations and performance curves. Using the Pentair Total Head Calculator, I calculated about 20 feet of head at 140 GPM using a dedicated 3" line and dedicated pump. For reference, I have a two 3" suction lines about 3' deep at the deep end of the pool, joined through a "T" (for safety), that then travel 120 feet through six 90 degree turns and two 45 degree turns and then back again to the water feature through about the same number of turns and distance. The water feature is about 4 feet above the water line, and currently I have the 3" pipe at that elevation just pointing towards the pool for testing with no water feature.
I decided on the IntellifloXF VSF because the performance curves showed it supported higher GPM at lower head ranges (5-20 ft total head) than the IntelloFlo or IntelliFlo3.

When I started testing, I'm only getting 83 GPM at 3450 RPM which would equate to 90 ft total head on the graph which is WAY off from my calculation of 20 ft head. I tested at several speeds and got the following
750 RPM - 1 GPM
1500 RPM - 44 GPM
2350 RPM - 64 GPM
3110 RPM - 78 GPM
3450 RPM - 83 GPM
I actually have a second almost identical setup with a second pump for a second water feature and am getting about the same results.
I know that 240 ft of pipe with ~16 turns is a lot, but I thought a dedicated 3" pipe with the IntellifloXF VSF would have no problem getting 140 GPM or over. I'm wondering if something else is going on with "low" Total Head and possibly the pump having too little resistance to get the maximum GPM? The performance curve lines always seem to "end" to the lower right as the head gets lower and I'm wondering how the pump behaves if you go below the total head where they stop the lines.
If my calculations are off, my last resort is to relocate the pumps 10-15 feet from the suction and water feature, but that will be quite costly and difficult.
Also, I am trusting that the GPM reading on the pump is roughly accurate. I've purchased a flow meter but haven't had a chance to install it to confirm the readings.
Any thoughts?
I decided on the IntellifloXF VSF because the performance curves showed it supported higher GPM at lower head ranges (5-20 ft total head) than the IntelloFlo or IntelliFlo3.

When I started testing, I'm only getting 83 GPM at 3450 RPM which would equate to 90 ft total head on the graph which is WAY off from my calculation of 20 ft head. I tested at several speeds and got the following
750 RPM - 1 GPM
1500 RPM - 44 GPM
2350 RPM - 64 GPM
3110 RPM - 78 GPM
3450 RPM - 83 GPM
I actually have a second almost identical setup with a second pump for a second water feature and am getting about the same results.
I know that 240 ft of pipe with ~16 turns is a lot, but I thought a dedicated 3" pipe with the IntellifloXF VSF would have no problem getting 140 GPM or over. I'm wondering if something else is going on with "low" Total Head and possibly the pump having too little resistance to get the maximum GPM? The performance curve lines always seem to "end" to the lower right as the head gets lower and I'm wondering how the pump behaves if you go below the total head where they stop the lines.
If my calculations are off, my last resort is to relocate the pumps 10-15 feet from the suction and water feature, but that will be quite costly and difficult.
Also, I am trusting that the GPM reading on the pump is roughly accurate. I've purchased a flow meter but haven't had a chance to install it to confirm the readings.
Any thoughts?