PoolGuyNJ said:
For the decking around the pool, I would really need to see it and test it. I would likely cut a 12.5" out line around the pool, remove the stone on top of the bond beam, and then either replace it with 12" long coping bricks or try to shave 1/2" (+/- 1/4") off the outside edge of the stone. A 7" grinder with a diamond blade is enough of an outline. It won't be perfect but with the caulk in between, only you will know of any imperfections. That would leave a half inch gap to be filled between the bond beam and the rest of the decking. I use either sand or backer rod and self leveling caulk so each can expand and contract at different rates. The height is adjusted using mortar between the stone and the bond beam. Mixing mortar, chipping mortar off surfaces are pretty stress free. Setting the stones of bricks, cutting the bricks for curves might be a bit more nerve racking. If you are able to remove the old mortar, you can likely save the stone and material costs of new brick. The setting of them is dependent on the use of bubble levels of various sizes.
Awesome, thank you man. I'm going to use your advice to kickstart my research into this. I'm going to look around for other material that may work as an edge as well. I personally like the more modern, clean lines that you see in concrete or wood (even the new hybrid stuff). I also recognize that it can get expensive quick. Having the rocks meet a clean lined border may give it a more appealing look to me (and hopefully others). I'll keep you (and anyone else interested) in my pursuit here.
PoolGuyNJ said:
As for the tile thickness, thicker is better usually, The thin set mortar is almost always white or gray and defines how far out from the sealed gunite wall it will be. It should be about 1/2" out. I can't stress enough using a pro for this and I still don't like glass near a pool. Its the #1 reason I don't offer my customers Beadcrete finishes either. Being in the South is different than NJ however. Using a tile pro with pool experience is strongly encouraged by me. I am just not comfortable otherwise. Remember, the waterline will be 1/2 exposed, 1/2 submerged at a minimum and that can lead to issues. It is why I use pool rated tile, not regular tiles like you find on the floor, bathroom, or back splash of a home.
I figured as much. It makes a lot more sense as well since the tile itself would be sturdier.
The reason I decided to go down the route of tile vs plaster is because I was having a really hard time finding plaster companies (not pool companies that are jacking up their rates through the roof). I can find tilers pretty easily and assuming they are okay with it, I may even be able to help where as with plaster there's really nothing I could do to save on costs.
PoolGuyNJ said:
The wall, if you can get some help, would need to be dug to the base. There you can see if the footer used broke or not, Lose the existing wall and rebuild it, I suspect the footer is fine but is an easy fix if it isn't. 6" square pressure treated lumber (use the good stuff. HD land Lowes won't carry it because of it's cost), a chain saw and spikes. A few drainage ports with perforated pipe and gravel for the back side and it's done. Just back fill and sod it . Done. Lots of money to be saved there!
Since I'll be doing it myself, I'm afraid to take down the wall without removing the trees. As I do not want to remove them, I think going out 2' - 3' and building a new wall up to about 3', knocking down what is there now, georgidding and then finishing the last portion would give me the support needed to maintain the weight while allowing me to build at my own time.
I plan to add drill in drain holes every 6" or so on the existing wall to hopefully prevent it from pushing out on my new wall.
PoolGuyNJ said:
The finishing of the pool should be done by those have the skills. You don't. These guys do it daily.
HTH,
Scott
Farming out what you can't do will save you a good chunk
Understood and I really appreciate your advice.
It's not just saving costs either for me, but time. I'm a consultant so my hourly rate has to be considered. Once you work on an hourly basis, you quickly realize that money = time and time = money. At the same time, I recognize how much pool companies are marking up labor. I have nothing against that but I'd just rather pay a premium for them to farm out the work.
It really just comes down to who or what I can find in terms of direct labor. If I can manage to find a plaster company, then by all means, that's what I intend to use. But at the same time, if I'm saving 80% off of retail by going straight to the source on tiling, I see that as a potential for huge savings too. If I can find a good set of tilers that can get the job done in the 3k range, then I'm going to come out ahead over hiring a pool company to do plastering.