Ditched the ColorQ for the TF-100

Well, the previous point was that the color q is NOT consistent. Repeated tests on the same water gives different results. Which do you believe?

My ColorQ readings are almost always consistently lower than my TF100 readings (FCL might read 4.5ppm when actual is 6, PH might be 7.4 when actual is 7.6, etc), but the magnitude difference is fairly constant. The biggest variation is CH which reads about 100 ppm lower (200 vs 300). Basically, I can look at the Color Q readings and know what the TF100 will read before I take the measurements.
 
Thread Status
Hello , This thread has been inactive for over 60 days. New postings here are unlikely to be seen or responded to by other members. For better visibility, consider Starting A New Thread.