Hi Folks,
Not sure if this is the right place to discuss...
I ordered a robot cleaner which needs a power from the power center box. A licensed contractor installed a GFCI outdoor receptacle from the power center. The robot was plugged to the GFCI receptacle; it worked fine so far.
I opened up the power center a few months later and noticed that the GFCI’s supply side was wired such that its Neutural and GND pings tied together and short to the GND bar inside the power center. See the attached photo for details. I guess the reason he did this was that inside the power center it’s mainly 240V, provided by the L1 and L2 from the main breaker box. And due to some reason there’s no neutural wire from the supply side. Thus, to get 120V, the easiest way is to tie the GFCI’s N to the grounding tab inside the power center.
Such an implementation causes a concern though. As the grounding bar directly shorts to the metal housing of the power center, isn’t there a chance that the whole power center housing gets energized as it’s actually serving as the neutral for the GFCI. It seems to me the implementation increases the chance of electrocute when one touches the housing’s exposed metal as the human body serves as a parallel path to return to the main breaker box.
I think the correct way to do this is fishing the neutral wire from the house breaker box into the power center, then connects to the N of the GFCI. And GFCI’s GND ties to the grounding bar. Thus the GFCI ‘s N and GND is separated and only shorts together at the very far end in the house breaker box.
Contacted my contractor and he said it’s fine. He said the N and GND is tied together anyways and it doesn’t matter. Any thoughts?
Not sure if this is the right place to discuss...
I ordered a robot cleaner which needs a power from the power center box. A licensed contractor installed a GFCI outdoor receptacle from the power center. The robot was plugged to the GFCI receptacle; it worked fine so far.
I opened up the power center a few months later and noticed that the GFCI’s supply side was wired such that its Neutural and GND pings tied together and short to the GND bar inside the power center. See the attached photo for details. I guess the reason he did this was that inside the power center it’s mainly 240V, provided by the L1 and L2 from the main breaker box. And due to some reason there’s no neutural wire from the supply side. Thus, to get 120V, the easiest way is to tie the GFCI’s N to the grounding tab inside the power center.
Such an implementation causes a concern though. As the grounding bar directly shorts to the metal housing of the power center, isn’t there a chance that the whole power center housing gets energized as it’s actually serving as the neutral for the GFCI. It seems to me the implementation increases the chance of electrocute when one touches the housing’s exposed metal as the human body serves as a parallel path to return to the main breaker box.
I think the correct way to do this is fishing the neutral wire from the house breaker box into the power center, then connects to the N of the GFCI. And GFCI’s GND ties to the grounding bar. Thus the GFCI ‘s N and GND is separated and only shorts together at the very far end in the house breaker box.
Contacted my contractor and he said it’s fine. He said the N and GND is tied together anyways and it doesn’t matter. Any thoughts?