Recent content by dja2477

  1. dja2477

    Pool Math and CSI dont jive.

    As an operator for Shell Oil making gas, running samples and controlling the process is built in and following me home. I''l try to ease up a bit. Thanks for the input.
  2. dja2477

    Pool Math and CSI dont jive.

    I got ya. Ill give it a try. I'll stay on top of my water chemistry like white on rice.
  3. dja2477

    Pool Math and CSI dont jive.

    Ok . thank you. I'm on it
  4. dja2477

    Pool Math and CSI dont jive.

    Fill water was like TA 82 pH 7.8 and CH 175.
  5. dja2477

    Pool Math and CSI dont jive.

    Ok, Ill try not to let the numbers eat at me. Im in Houston so the heat is coming soon and I know that will help a lot. I was just concerned about the high calcium. I don't like it. I'll bring it to 350 and adjust accordingly but refuse to dump another 10 or 15 pounds of calcium in my pool.
  6. dja2477

    Pool Math and CSI dont jive.

    I agree that much calcium seems too high but that is whats suggested. You can make the numbers work to get a good CSI however the ranges required are not what I'm used with a freshwater pool. And the CYA at required 70 or 80 almost makes me cringe because I just drained my pool to get rid of...
  7. dja2477

    Pool Math and CSI dont jive.

    Left column is what is suggested and the right column is my water now. I guess this method relays heavily on keeping CH at near 400 and pH at higher range at 7.7-7.8. I'm just curious why this is a better method for SWG pool. Recommended / Actual FC 5 / 7 pH 7.6 / 7.7 TA 70 / 95...
  8. dja2477

    Pool Math and CSI dont jive.

    I'm converting to SWG (ichlor30.) Pool is 16500 gallon pebbletech. When I play with the calculations entering variations of the recommended targets for SWG pool I'm getting like -5 which CSI says anything lower than -3 is corrosive. I've adjusted every target within the ranges recommended and...